indeed.
after moving our builds from ant to maven (which was a real improvement)
i have to say that eclipse integration lacks a certain comfort.
i tried q4e but m2eclipse works much better for me. if someone starts a
comparison chart in a wiki or so i am glad to help filling the rows :)
the comparison with subversive / sublcipse is frequently used and quite
good. but i am not satisfied with the situation there. both plugins are
incomplete but in different areas. it is like doing thw work twice with
no better solution coming out. so i dont understand why there is q4e at all.
having the same situation with m2eclipse and q4e cant be too good. from
my 20 developers i have 2 that actually do releases with maven. the rest
sees maven as some eclipse plugin which fails on hot-code-replacement.
(different story). ide integration is a critical feature. having to
choose on or another plugin does not improve that situation.
but well. lets see :-)
glad m2eclipse will live! thanks a lot!
Donnie McNeal schrieb:
IMO it seems that q4e and m2eclipse has finally lit a fire in the
eclipse community to bring quality maven support to the IDE. So, hooray
for both!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
