Hi Tim, I ran into the same when I reiterated my steps. Initially I installed the dependencies using the update manager, but that gave me the wrong versions. I downloaded another emf sdk in the 2.3 (http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/downloads/?project=emf) range that should be binary compatible with 3.2 and is using generics, but I still get the compile errors. I haven't had much time to investigate further. I guess it would be next to impossible to set RAD 7 as the target platform so I was wondering if running a remote debug session would work? Maybe I'll try that tonight.
Hugo -----Original Message----- From: Tim Schwenk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 16 september 2008 5:11 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [m2eclipse-user] IBM Rational Application Developer 7 (aka RAD7) support? OK, so I didn't have as much time as I'd hoped to look at this over the weekend, but I did manage to just about get my development environment setup. The problem I ran into was related to gathering up the required dependencies for configuring an E3.2 target platform - specifically the emf-sdo-xsd-SDK-2.2.4.zip. The zip that is linked from the Wiki doesn't exist on the main Eclipse site or on the archive site. I was able to locate a 2.2.4 version from the archive site, but the version that the Wiki link was pointing to looked like 2.2.4-M200708282030 and the version that I found would not allow me to compile several projects due to the fact that several of the EMF classes weren't generic when they needed to be. I'm sorry I can't give more details because I just realized that I was using my work notebook to do this and I'm too lazy to go get that and boot it up now. Anyway, does it sound like a different version of the emf-sdo-xsd SDK would resolve the compilation problems, and if so, any idea which version I should use? One other thing... If a different version of this SDK is necessary to compile, will that same version also be required at runtime? If so, I think that's going to be a problem with RAD7 - I'm pretty sure that EMF is one of the plugins that can only be updated with patches from IBM. -Tim On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Eugene Kuleshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Visser, Hugo wrote: >> >> OK, the presence of a pom.xml with dependencies in it made me believe >> that m2eclipse is required. > > We do build m2eclipse with Maven/Tycho from the command line, hence > the pom files. But those pom files currently are not used in the PDE. >> >> I still have issues getting set up for the Eclipse 3.2 target. For >> example I get unresolved imports on >> "org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.classpathdep.IClasspathDependencyConstants". I >> must be missing a dependency in the 3.2 target. However JST is >> installed (1.54). >> > > What m2eclipse project those dependencies can't be resolved for? > As far as I know, class IClasspathDependencyConstants is only used by > org.maven.ide.eclipse.wtp, but that project, as well as ajdt > integration is not going to work on Eclipse 3.2. WTP version that > works with Eclipse 3.2 is > 1.5 (I think) and it had very different API from WTP 2.x and 3.x > required by org.maven.ide.eclipse.wtp. > > So, if you do need support for WTP 1.5, I would recommend to work on > it incrementally. > * first step. remove/close project org.maven.ide.eclipse.wtp from your > workspace and make sure that core m2eclipse functionality is working > in Eclipse 3.2/RAD7 > * second step. study the org.maven.ide.eclipse.wtp code and implement > your own org.maven.ide.eclipse.wtp1 (or org.maven.ide.eclipse.rad7) > that would use WTP 1.5 or RAD7 API to configure projects in RAD7 > >> Here's the config for the 3.2 instance: http://pastebin.com/m29c95bed. >> Do you see any things that are missing? I'm not really experienced >> with Eclipse plugin development, so please be gentle :) >> > > First of all, I would like to say that Eclipse installation you are > using for development don't have to be your Target Platform. Though it > is probably the easiest way to set Target Platform manually, because > you could use Eclipse Update Manager to bring the required dependencies locally. > >> I'm still determined to debug RAD 7, just having a hard time to get >> started... >> > > It would be great if you could update wiki pages to document your > difficulties and the ways you got around them. > > Thanks > > Eugene > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
