i think we would have to host mathjax to apease the browsers under https handshake. I am not sure what would be associated with that, I am not sure if mathjax is solely static content or it is an actual server doing something.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> wrote: > What if we store a copy of the js file on our site and also serve it via > https? > > > On 04/27/2014 05:34 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > >> Often CMSs have a way to configure https access to be used only for >> password or other secure areas of the site. No idea if the Apache CMS does >> this but worth asking. If there is no https fix seems like Mathjax should >> be discontinued. >> >> >> On Apr 26, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have no solution for https. It is most likely security thing. >> >> I just asked that whomever writes blog to fix https links to simple >> unsecure ones. >> On Apr 26, 2014 6:24 PM, "Andrew Musselman" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> There was chat last week about this breaking, something about https vs >>> http in the link to Mathjax as I recall. >>> >>> Dmitriy was dealing with it last I saw. >>> >>> On Apr 26, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I probably missed some announcement but why is the math markup coming >>>> >>> out raw? Do I need a plugin or something? >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> \[\mathbf{G}=\mathbf{B}\mathbf{B}^{\top}-\mathbf{C}-\ >>> mathbf{C}^{\top}+\mathbf{s}_{q}\mathbf{s}_{q}^{\top}\ >>> boldsymbol{\xi}^{\top}\boldsymbol{\xi}\] >>> >>> >> >
