Mathjax is both static content and server. There is an FAQ about this https problem. I think that part of the issue is that they don't use the same URL for both http and https connections.
http://www.mathjax.org/resources/faqs/#problem-https The URL that they suggest to use for getting mathjax.js is https://c328740.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/mathjax/latest/MathJax.js This is required because the rackspace cdn won't allow the http address to be used with https. Perversely, this https address also breaks when used with http. My guess is that if we update our css/headers/templates to use this https address then things will work. On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]>wrote: > i think we would have to host mathjax to apease the browsers under https > handshake. I am not sure what would be associated with that, I am not sure > if mathjax is solely static content or it is an actual server doing > something. > > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > What if we store a copy of the js file on our site and also serve it via > > https? > > > > > > On 04/27/2014 05:34 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > > > >> Often CMSs have a way to configure https access to be used only for > >> password or other secure areas of the site. No idea if the Apache CMS > does > >> this but worth asking. If there is no https fix seems like Mathjax > should > >> be discontinued. > >> > >> > >> On Apr 26, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I have no solution for https. It is most likely security thing. > >> > >> I just asked that whomever writes blog to fix https links to simple > >> unsecure ones. > >> On Apr 26, 2014 6:24 PM, "Andrew Musselman" <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> There was chat last week about this breaking, something about https vs > >>> http in the link to Mathjax as I recall. > >>> > >>> Dmitriy was dealing with it last I saw. > >>> > >>> On Apr 26, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I probably missed some announcement but why is the math markup coming > >>>> > >>> out raw? Do I need a plugin or something? > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> \[\mathbf{G}=\mathbf{B}\mathbf{B}^{\top}-\mathbf{C}-\ > >>> mathbf{C}^{\top}+\mathbf{s}_{q}\mathbf{s}_{q}^{\top}\ > >>> boldsymbol{\xi}^{\top}\boldsymbol{\xi}\] > >>> > >>> > >> > > >
