install instructions (and content tree) seems to be pretty static. All JS or static files.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: > i think we would have to host mathjax to apease the browsers under https > handshake. I am not sure what would be associated with that, I am not sure > if mathjax is solely static content or it is an actual server doing > something. > > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]>wrote: > >> What if we store a copy of the js file on our site and also serve it via >> https? >> >> >> On 04/27/2014 05:34 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: >> >>> Often CMSs have a way to configure https access to be used only for >>> password or other secure areas of the site. No idea if the Apache CMS does >>> this but worth asking. If there is no https fix seems like Mathjax should >>> be discontinued. >>> >>> >>> On Apr 26, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I have no solution for https. It is most likely security thing. >>> >>> I just asked that whomever writes blog to fix https links to simple >>> unsecure ones. >>> On Apr 26, 2014 6:24 PM, "Andrew Musselman" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> There was chat last week about this breaking, something about https vs >>>> http in the link to Mathjax as I recall. >>>> >>>> Dmitriy was dealing with it last I saw. >>>> >>>> On Apr 26, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I probably missed some announcement but why is the math markup coming >>>>> >>>> out raw? Do I need a plugin or something? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> \[\mathbf{G}=\mathbf{B}\mathbf{B}^{\top}-\mathbf{C}-\ >>>> mathbf{C}^{\top}+\mathbf{s}_{q}\mathbf{s}_{q}^{\top}\ >>>> boldsymbol{\xi}^{\top}\boldsymbol{\xi}\] >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
