what is the alternative and if one would still want to use the "frequent pattern mining code" in the future, how would this be possible otherwise?
Thanks Michael Am 28.04.14 08:19, schrieb Sebastian Schelter: > Hi, > > I'm resending this mail to also include the users list. To wrap up: We > currently have a discussion whether our frequent pattern mining > package should stay in the codebase. The original author suggested to > remove the original implementation and maybe retain the FPGrowth2 > implementation. > > I'd like to ask our users here on their opionion, is anybody opposed > to removing the frequent pattern mining code from Mahout? Please shout > out. > > --sebastian
