Hi Sharma, Awesome!. This is what I was looking for. Thanks for the reply.
I will have a look for more info in wiki. Regards, Pradeep On 5 October 2015 at 18:28, Sharma Podila <[email protected]> wrote: > Pradeep, > > We recently open sourced Fenzo <https://github.com/Netflix/Fenzo> (wiki > <https://github.com/Netflix/Fenzo/wiki>) to handle these scenarios. We > add a custom attribute for network bandwidth for each agent's "mesos-slave" > command line. And we have Fenzo assign resources to tasks based on CPU, > memory, disk, ports, and network bandwidth requirements. With Fenzo you can > define affinity, locality, and any other custom scheduling objectives using > plugins. Some of the plugins are already built in. It is also easy to add > additional plugins to cover other objectives you care about. > > "Dependencies" can mean multiple things. Do you mean dependencies on > certain attributes of resources/agents? Dependencies on where other tasks > are assigned? All of these are covered. However, if you mean workflow type > of dependencies on completion of other tasks, then, there are no built in > plugins. You could write one using Fenzo. It is also common for such > workflow dependencies to be covered by an entity external to the scheduler. > Both techniques can be made to work. > > Fenzo has the concept of hard Vs soft constraints. You could specify, for > example, resource affinity and/or task locality as a soft constraint or a > hard constraint. See the wiki docs link I provided above for details. > > Sharma > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Pradeep Kiruvale < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Are there any frameworks that exists with the Mesos to schedule the >> bigger apps? >> I mean to say scheduling a app which has many services and will not fit >> into one physical node. >> >> Is there any frame work that can be used to >> schedule tasks based on the underlying hardware constraints like Network >> bandwidth ? >> Schedule the tasks based on their dependencies and proximity to each >> other in a cluster or a rack? >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Pradeep >> > >
