Frank Boehme wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a number of student groups who have selected more or less nifty
> web related projects as their Final Year piece. Some of them decided to
> use midgard as the application server. In fact, I have pointed them to
> all sorts of other options (cocoon, zope, ariadne, ezpublish,
> php-only,...), because there is no standard answer what to use for which
> purpose, but those who will go for midgard have good reasons for their
> choice.
>
> I am afraid, it will be me who gets lumbered to install a new central
> midgard server for these students, because our sysadmins and tech
> support stuff is totally occupied with other very urgent problems. Just
> a few questions about what would you recommend:
>
> 1. Old admin site or asgard? (We do need sitegroups)
The old admin site does not support sitegroups, so you'd need Asgard.
Another
option is to use multidb and stuff each (group of) sites in a separate
DB.
Asgard looks a lot better BTW, and is more complete. But I don't know
how good the in-place upgrade (repligard) is yet; Alexander and David
know
more about that.
> 2. Beta7 or cvs?
I'd go with CVS. Some stuff has been fixed since, and besides, it'll
help
us in the bug shakeout.
> 3. Platform will likely be SuSE Linux 7.0. Are there any issues, for
> example known problems with the versions of mysql or apache/apxs?
Not that I know of. Is a SuSE 7.0 iso available somewhere? I'll give it
a go.
Emile
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
