Frank Boehme wrote:
> > Another
> > option is to use multidb and stuff each (group of) sites in a separate
> > DB.
>
> I think this would cause too many mysql connections
The too many connections problem has been solved. As long as you use
MidgardDatabase databasename commonuser commonpass
it will only open one connection.
> and it also looks a bit outdated.
:) That's a matter of taste I guess. Oh, you mean the admin site? I
guess
so, yes.
> > Asgard looks a lot better BTW, and is more complete. But I don't know
> > how good the in-place upgrade (repligard) is yet; Alexander and David
> > know more about that.
>
> Don't worry about that. So, I'll have asgard in one db and the sites in
> another.
That won't work. Asgard needs to be in the same database with the site
being managed.
> > I'd go with CVS. Some stuff has been fixed since, and besides, it'll
> > help us in the bug shakeout.
>
> So is cvs stable at the moment?
I'd say yes. We're in feature freeze leading up to the xmas release.
Only
bugs get fixed now.
Emile
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
