Karsten Dambekalns wrote: > I would prefer single files per part/section, but I will accept > whatever the majority thinks is appropriate. Reason for that is, I am > not using Word Perfect, and I wouldn't buy it just for editing SGML - > I would rather use emacs for it :-)
I'm not going there :) (vi user myself), Will emacs be able to handle the files? > But anyway, whatever gets decided... Another thing is, what about > DocBookXML? AFAIK this is the way to go nowadays. Who else is working > on the documentation? Maybe you should discusss this... I'm all for DocbookXML. More XML tools than SGML tools anyway. Votes? Volunteers for the conversion? Where can I find the DTD for DocbookXML? > > If people think it's a good idea, I'd propose > > to make the monolithic files the defnitive source and over time clear > > out the others. > > Whether monithic or not, cleaning up would be good :-) No kidding :) Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
