Hi, On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Emiliano wrote: > > > > I'm all for DocbookXML. More XML tools than SGML tools anyway. Votes? > > > > Volunteers for the conversion? Where can I find the DTD for > > > > DocbookXML? > > > > > > The current XML version of DocBook, files etc including DTD > > > > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/docbook/xml/4.1.2/index.shtml > > > > Right, but as Armand just pointed out we really need tools to convert > > pages to other formats. Without it we can't move over. > > > > Uhm, I must admit I'm pretty hot on XML these days so my first > > reaction was 'yeah! let's do it!', but in retrospect, given the little > > resources we have, we should have a good reason to convert our docs > > before actually making the content current. > > The fact that the php documentation effort uses XML is actually a pretty > compelling reason IMHO. I am checking out phpdoc CVS right now hoping that > I will be able to find out what tools they are using from there, as I did > not find any instructions elsewhere. I'm hoping that I can figure out the > logic, as I would like the function reference to follow the documentation > structure php has set for extensions. Hey, we may want to intergrate the > function reference into php at some point in time.
Hmmm, I just transfered the entire manual into xml on my local system, using the phpdoc build system. I have to make some changes so that the multilingual documentation works, and I have to incorporate the generation of images. When done, I can commit to CVS and move our documentation system over to DocBook-XML. What do you think? -- Envida http://www.envida.net/ Armand A. Verstappen Graadt van Roggenweg 328 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3531 AH Utrecht tel: +31 (0)30 298 2255 Postbus 19127 fax: +31 (0)30 298 2111 3501 DC Utrecht --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
