Heine, Dieter wrote: > As a tool mostly used as an API for developers with (mostly guessed) a > commercial background there is not much time left for documentation.
Ah, like that. Well yes, that's valid. We all have dayjobs that are not Midgard-related. > I > guess that e.g. Mr Hammer maybe had more non-commercial use for it and > therefor asked for better documentation. Commercial was meant in > combination with professional. Private or common users usually don't > start with complicated APIs.Professionals on the other hand usually need > less documentation (or use the source for docu purpose ) I understand. Well, professionals need good docu too, I think. > However I think it is clear task of many satisfied users whether for > private or commercial use to document their experiences as a service > return to the project Ry. The question why this didnot happen yet maybe > possibly be answered with a more commercial utilization. Don't discount that writing docs is hard. People may feel intimidated by the technical nature of it. Which shouldn't be an issue (see 'fresh look' post of a few days ago), but I think that's how it's percieved. Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
