> I'm not saying they shouldn't, I was just wondering about the > 'mostly'. I read (possibly misread) that as 'not for non-commercial', > which puzzled me. >
As a tool mostly used as an API for developers with (mostly guessed) a commercial background there is not much time left for documentation. I guess that e.g. Mr Hammer maybe had more non-commercial use for it and therefor asked for better documentation. Commercial was meant in combination with professional. Private or common users usually don't start with complicated APIs.Professionals on the other hand usually need less documentation (or use the source for docu purpose ) However I think it is clear task of many satisfied users whether for private or commercial use to document their experiences as a service return to the project Ry. The question why this didnot happen yet maybe possibly be answered with a more commercial utilization. dieter -- Kind regards Dieter Heine Systemadministration Unix Astrium GmbH Raumfahrt Bremen EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: 49 421 539 5698 Phone: 49 421 539 4989 User Help Desk Astrium Hamburg Phone (office Bremen): on request --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
