Heine, Dieter wrote: > > > document my part first, because midgard is mostly an API for developers > > > with commercial background. > > > > Commercial background? How so? > > > why should developers with commercial background not use midgard > API ? > I have no statistic about midgard users. I took the reference and
I'm not saying they shouldn't, I was just wondering about the 'mostly'. I read (possibly misread) that as 'not for non-commercial', which puzzled me. > applications page of midgards web site. Most applications come directly > from companies. As you may remember my comment in conjunction with the > new midgard web site release I wondered why asgard is missing or kept in > background E.g. on the application and reference page asgard is missing > as the only completly free application that can be used from the start. OK, that would be an oversight. It's bundled in the data package so it's part of Midgard, not an addon, but it probably needs more attention. Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
