Hi,
-1
package name
- starting with 1.1 the packages are named apache-nutch-1.x-*
Shouldn't we follow this convention?
- the top level folder inside is named differently in previous releases,
either
nutch-1.x (1.3-bin, 1.2-bin)
or
apache-nutch-1.x (1.4-bin, 1.4-src, 1.3-src, 1.2-src)
Shouldn't we agree upon one variant? Possibly one for bin,
the other for src?
> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
"ant package-bin" suggests this.
It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
the tutorial.
Sebastian
