Hi Piet, Flagging the info in the Wiki which is either incorrect or outdated would be useful in itself. Feel free to create a page to track this or comment directly on the docs. No contributions are too small
Thanks Julien On 24 May 2012 08:37, Piet van Remortel <[email protected]> wrote: > Can I carefully suggest that things like the tutorial indeed get some > attention in case of a new release. I found the learning curve quite steep > in the beginning exactly because of outdated nature of the plethora of > distributed information around. Wouldn't mind helping a hand, but I don't > feel I know nutch enough to write docs. > > regards > > Piet > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Julien Nioche < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Seb > > > > Moved to dev@ as more relevant > > > > [...] > > > > > - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/ > > > What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ? > > > Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and > > > place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder? > > > > "ant package-bin" suggests this. > > > > > > yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin > version > > it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile > the > > job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway > > > > It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict > > > the tutorial. > > > > > > > The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are > > volunteering? > > > > Julien > > > > -- > > * > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > > http://www.digitalpebble.com > > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble > > > -- * *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ http://www.digitalpebble.com http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
