Can I carefully suggest that things like the tutorial indeed get some
attention in case of a new release. I found the learning curve quite steep
in the beginning exactly because of outdated nature of the plethora of
distributed information around. Wouldn't mind helping a hand, but I don't
feel I know nutch enough to write docs.
regards
Piet
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Julien Nioche <
lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Seb
>
> Moved to dev@ as more relevant
>
> [...]
>
> > - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
> > What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
> > Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
> > place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
>
> "ant package-bin" suggests this.
>
>
> yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin version
> it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile the
> job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway
>
> It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
> > the tutorial.
> >
>
> The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
> volunteering?
>
> Julien
>
> --
> *
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>
