skip I have implemented similar in the service I provide on line for
webstores.
been doing it since 1998.
see my other email.

Skip sent the following on 10/24/2007 5:04 PM:
> BJ
> 
> This logic gets very complicated very quickly.  You can throw into the mix
> two dropship suppliers with different prices and shipping times.  Maybe the
> customer wants one and it comes in a box of 10.  Its even more complicated
> if you require a 35% margin and getting that margin requires you to order a
> hundred.  It gets even more complicated still if....
> 
> The application I am converting to Ofbiz took me two years to get right in
> this area ( at least right from the clients perspective).  Two years of
> tweeking that it is.  I ended up with three scenerios, case 1 where I knew
> for sure what to do.  Case 2 where I was pretty sure what to do, and case
> three where I didn't have a clue.
> 
> I ended up doing case 1 without operator intervention, and presenting 2
> separate lists of the last 2 cases to a human operator to approve.  This has
> worked in 21 installations of this application for over 15 years now and is
> one of the few things I don't get complaints about or requests for changes.
> 
> Skip
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:36 PM
> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
> Subject: Re: shipments made for out of stock items
> 
> 
> Ok lets take it from the item issuance.
> here is the scenario.
> one product
> two suppliers
> one used to refill local stock
> one one to dropship.
> 
> so you may have local stock or it may be ordered from the supplier that
> refills local stock.
> and under certain circumstances the dropshipper is used.
> 
> now you may check inventory which means look at any orders pending
> and on determining that the delivery date is beyond the ship date to the
> customer may opt to send the order to the Dropshipper.
> 
> so putting in parms like use local inventory if with in so many days of
> shipping date to customer
> or if available use dropship under any circumstance to satisfy back orders.
> 
> Not sure if this goes with the product or inventory in a facility
> I was thinking of having a place in the product to assign a service that
> would best suit the configuration for a client.
> 
> this would allow many scenarios with out really changing the programming
> of ofbiz.
> 
> 
> David E Jones sent the following on 10/24/2007 4:19 PM:
>> I'm not sure I totally understand what you're looking at BJ...
>>
>> This may very well make sense as a configuration flag, either for a
>> ProductStore or for a Facility, so specify whether or not shipping
>> without inventory in stock is allowed.
>>
>> The Quick Ship Entire Order service would be affected by this, as would
>> certain other things. The best place to implement it is probably in the
>> issue order item to shipment service (the one that creates the
>> ItemIssuance records). That's what actually takes thing out of stock (ie
>> does the stock out).
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Oct 24, 2007, at 5:05 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>
>>> if the inventory supplier is a dropshipper would be the consideration.
>>> since you can have many suppliers for a product, you could have a
>>> supplier you order from for your local supplier and a drop shipper as
>>> well.
>>> this would come under a scenario of determining best cost and delivery
>>> of the product which is part of ERP.
>>>
>>> So I don't think a simple flag is the answer.
>>>
>>>
>>> Skip sent the following on 10/24/2007 3:33 PM:
>>>> BJ
>>>>
>>>> No, I have considered only my own needs.  However, a property which
>>>> determines the behavior satisfies both camps.
>>>>
>>>> Skip
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:27 PM
>>>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: shipments made for out of stock items
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Skip have you consider the sequence for a dropshipper, and some
>>>> fulfillment houses.
>>>> you don't have their inventory.
>>>>
>>>> Skip sent the following on 10/24/2007 1:09 PM:
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree that this is a big hole/bug.  On the other hand, there are
>>>>> folks
>>>> who
>>>>> don't mind/prefer the sloppiness (I have a customer just like
>>>>> that).  So,
>>>>> perhaps we could use a property to define the behavior, like:
>>>>>
>>>>> ilikesloppybookkeeping=true/false  (tongue in cheek)
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I would be happy to collaborate to get this done.  I want
>>>>> requirements and automatic backorders issued for out of stock etc for
>>>> quick
>>>>> ship.  I was just about to start work on this.  We could modify the
>>>> existing
>>>>> service to look for a property and if it exists, do the better
>>>>> bookkeeping
>>>> /
>>>>> automatic ordering.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a hole for me because if my customer has a customer at the
>>>>> counter
>>>>> and is selling him some stuff and part of it is on back order, he
>>>>> has to
>>>>> exit out of the sales order screen and go to the shipping screen to
>>>>> get it
>>>>> all done right.  It's a pain and will happen 10 times a day for him.
>>>> Fixing
>>>>> the quickship will take care of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe with the configurable property, the muckity-mucks won't be so
>>>>> reluctant to accept it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Skip
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:24 PM
>>>>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: shipments made for out of stock items
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 24, 2007, at 6:41 AM, Dave Tenerowicz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The more I think about this, it seems inappropriate for an ERP
>>>>>> system to allow this. Why would the quick ship service allow a user
>>>>>> to charge a customers credit card  and "ship" a physical product
>>>>>> that the system "knew" was not available?
>>>>> For some users the system doesn't know everything...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Before charging the card, the sales person would want to confirm
>>>>>> that the goods were actually available. Once this was confirmed, it
>>>>>> would take a facility worker 30 seconds to adjust the inventory,
>>>>>> leaving an audit trail etc.
>>>>> Yes, but not everyone wants to use it this way.
>>>>>
>>>>>> To me this seems like a JIRA issue, which should be fixed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll submit the issue and we'll submit a fix.
>>>>> It will most likely be rejected.
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave Tenerowicz wrote:
>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David E Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>> Well, there ya go!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The quick ship order stuff doesn't check stock levels...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 23, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Dave Tenerowicz wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, I should have mentioned that we created a new service to
>>>>>>>>> automatically create shipments. It calls quickShipOrder as part
>>>>>>>>> of it's processing.
>>>>>>>>> -Dave
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> David E Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> What do you mean by "being created"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There isn't really anything that automatically creates
>>>>>>>>>> shipments, unless a human does it through some UI like the
>>>>>>>>>> shipment or packing screens (or a service or something was
>>>>>>>>>> written to automatically do it somehow).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Dave Tenerowicz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that shipments are being created with out of stock
>>>>>>>>>>> items in an implementation we are doing. I am guessing this is
>>>>>>>>>>> due to product store settings, not a code issue.
>>>>>>>>>>> rev =  545314
>>>>>>>>>>> check inventory=Y
>>>>>>>>>>> reserve inventory=Y
>>>>>>>>>>> require inventory=N
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All products are finished goods (no digital or virtual)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for any help.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Tenerowicz
>>>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 303.493.6727
>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile 303.906.6116
>>>>>>>>>>> Fax 303.814.8330
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Visit us at http://www.salmonllc.com
>>>>>>>>>>> For ERP Information: http://www.salmonllc.com/Jsp/vanity/
>>>>>>>>>>> ERP_CRM.jsp?nav=2&NavBarId=ERP_CRMServices
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dave Tenerowicz
>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Office: 303.493.6727
>>>>>>>>> Mobile 303.906.6116
>>>>>>>>> Fax 303.814.8330
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Visit us at http://www.salmonllc.com
>>>>>>>>> For ERP Information: http://www.salmonllc.com/Jsp/vanity/
>>>>>>>>> ERP_CRM.jsp?nav=2&NavBarId=ERP_CRMServices
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dave Tenerowicz
>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Office: 303.493.6727
>>>>>> Mobile 303.906.6116
>>>>>> Fax 303.814.8330
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Visit us at http://www.salmonllc.com
>>>>>> For ERP Information: http://www.salmonllc.com/Jsp/vanity/
>>>>>> ERP_CRM.jsp?nav=2&NavBarId=ERP_CRMServices
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to