Did I say or imply that?
Now we're getting into trolling... so unless you want to talk about
something specific...
-David
On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:17 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
and from your response you don't agree.
interesting.
David E Jones sent the following on 3/9/2009 8:27 AM:
Ranting without any details is not constructive or actionable.
Hire a shrink.
-David
On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:54 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
I have been going through the code, and finding a frustration.
it seems that a lot of people are finding what i call short cuts for
their particular part of the code with out looking at the whole
picture.
My frustration is the effort to maintain such code.
Yes I know I am making a general statement with no examples.
I believe anyone that is looking at maintain this code would discover
the same thing.
So I ask all those that are creating patches, or adding new code,
please
look at the whole system before you make changes and see how we can
reuse instead re-create the wheel over and over with just minor
changes.
End of rant.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJtUETrP3NbaWWqE4RAqLuAJ4yWB8y2FY3KUoTl056/EYqv9ORxQCgleOY
xqPRKIv1x/vbdeobrLsg8Ys=
=fftF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----