Did I say or imply that?

Now we're getting into trolling... so unless you want to talk about something specific...

-David


On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:17 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

and from your response you don't agree.
interesting.

David E Jones sent the following on 3/9/2009 8:27 AM:

Ranting without any details is not constructive or actionable.

Hire a shrink.

-David


On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:54 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:

I have been going through the code, and finding a frustration.
it seems that a lot of people are finding what i call short cuts for
their particular part of the code with out looking at the whole picture.
My frustration is the effort to maintain such code.
Yes I know I am making a general statement with no examples.
I believe anyone that is looking at maintain this code would discover
the same thing.

So I ask all those that are creating patches, or adding new code, please
look at the whole system before you make changes and see how we can
reuse instead re-create the wheel over and over with just minor changes.

End of rant.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJtUETrP3NbaWWqE4RAqLuAJ4yWB8y2FY3KUoTl056/EYqv9ORxQCgleOY
xqPRKIv1x/vbdeobrLsg8Ys=
=fftF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to