-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 actually David I was not looking for Validation. Nor was I looking for anyone to chime in. Nor did I want to start a discussion. Just bring up an awareness. In that scope, bringing up a specific case only focuses on that problem not the general point. If those coding don't understand, then there is no way I am going to change them. I believe the way I said is valid and will stand by that.
David E Jones sent the following on 3/9/2009 9:27 AM: > > Did I say or imply that? > > Now we're getting into trolling... so unless you want to talk about > something specific... > > -David > > > On Mar 9, 2009, at 10:17 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: > > and from your response you don't agree. > interesting. > > David E Jones sent the following on 3/9/2009 8:27 AM: >>>> >>>> Ranting without any details is not constructive or actionable. >>>> >>>> Hire a shrink. >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:54 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: >>>> >>>> I have been going through the code, and finding a frustration. >>>> it seems that a lot of people are finding what i call short cuts for >>>> their particular part of the code with out looking at the whole picture. >>>> My frustration is the effort to maintain such code. >>>> Yes I know I am making a general statement with no examples. >>>> I believe anyone that is looking at maintain this code would discover >>>> the same thing. >>>> >>>> So I ask all those that are creating patches, or adding new code, please >>>> look at the whole system before you make changes and see how we can >>>> reuse instead re-create the wheel over and over with just minor changes. >>>> >>>> End of rant. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJtUeorP3NbaWWqE4RAhQhAKDFnL7Hu9whgNXEV8YrhWLstI9q/QCgqByC 3a/TiHvS5u32qOZsbkdQuYM= =s+nB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
