hmm...I compared the article and the latest code from trunk. I don't think the diagram is consistent with codes.
For example, from the diagram party doesn't depend on marketing; however, as I mentioned in previous email, party entity definition does use ContactListParty from marketing. -- Regards, Michael Xu (xudong) www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86) 135 0135 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Michael Xu (xudong) <[email protected]>wrote: > Just found an article about the dependency: > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies > > > <http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies>From > the component relationship diagram, it seems I have to include all > components under framework and application in my new application. Is it > correct? > > -- > Regards, > Michael Xu (xudong) > www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86) 135 > 0135 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096 > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Michael Xu (xudong) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> hi all, >> >> I try to build a new application using ofbiz. Basically, I want to use the >> nice overall architect of ofbiz, theme mechanism and >> Party/Permission/SecurityGroup. However, I found it is very difficult to >> remove unnecessary components. >> >> For example, entitymodel.xml from applications/party >> uses ContactListParty, which is from marketing component. I think such >> dependency doesn't make much sense, as marketing is only an optional >> component but party is a must. >> >> What's the best practice for my case? Advices and clues will be very >> appreciated. Thanks in advance. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Michael Xu >> >> >> >
