hi Adrian,

Yes, I agree with you for most issues. However, in my opinion this one seems
special, which might cause many fundamental changes. I guess a top-down
approach is more practical.

--
Regards,
Michael Xu (xudong)
www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86) 135 0135
9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096


On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Adrian Crum <[email protected]> wrote:

> That is not how the open source community works. If anyone wants to see
> this move along, they need to make the desired changes to their local copy,
> create a patch, and submit it to Jira.
>
> As far as coordination is concerned, there is an "umbrella" Jira issue for
> this already. Just make new Jira issues sub-tasks of it.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> Like Bruno mentioned, this topic has been discussed over many times. And
>> it
>> is time to take some actions. I really think one or more leaders should
>> lead
>> the process. Otherwise, the discussion might be around for a long long
>> time.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Michael Xu (xudong)
>> www.wizitsoft.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:41 PM, chris snow <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Bruno,
>>>
>>> I would like to help.  Are you coordinating efforts?
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bruno Busco wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>> the framework isolation and a framework-only installation is
>>>> definitely something the community as talken about many times. You
>>>> will find several conversations searching the mailing list.
>>>>
>>>> We will have it sooner or later and any help you could provide on this
>>>> topic will be much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> -Bruno
>>>>
>>>> 2009/11/24 Michael Xu (xudong) <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> hmm...I compared the article and the latest code from trunk. I don't
>>>>> think
>>>>> the diagram is consistent with codes.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, from the diagram party doesn't depend on marketing;
>>>>>
>>>> however,
>>>
>>>> as
>>>>> I mentioned in previous email, party entity definition does use
>>>>> ContactListParty from marketing.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Michael Xu (xudong)
>>>>> www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86)
>>>>> 135
>>>>> 0135
>>>>> 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Michael Xu (xudong)
>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Just found an article about the dependency:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
>>>
>>>> From
>>>>
>>>>> the component relationship diagram, it seems I have to include all
>>>>>> components under framework and application in my new application. Is
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Michael Xu (xudong)
>>>>>> www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86)
>>>>>>
>>>>> 135
>>>
>>>> 0135 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Michael Xu (xudong) <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I try to build a new application using ofbiz. Basically, I want to
>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> nice overall architect of ofbiz, theme mechanism and
>>>>>>> Party/Permission/SecurityGroup. However, I found it is very difficult
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> remove unnecessary components.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For example, entitymodel.xml from applications/party
>>>>>>> uses ContactListParty, which is from marketing component. I think
>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>> dependency doesn't make much sense, as marketing is only an optional
>>>>>>> component but party is a must.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's the best practice for my case? Advices and clues will be very
>>>>>>> appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Michael Xu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>  --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to