can you give me a lead in to those, what is the top Junit for those three.
Anil Patel sent the following on 2/23/2010 2:54 PM:
> BJ,
> All these work OOTB even today. Will you take that statement?
>
> We need real details that will allow writing Unit Tests and Selenium tests
> and at times have developer do tests and be able to reproduce results.
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Anil Patel
> HotWax Media Inc
> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
>
> On Feb 23, 2010, at 5:49 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>
>> the top level tests
>> 1) does an order, that is complete, come out in the GL properly
>> 2) same for Purchase Order.
>> 3) does a years worth for transactions balance.
>>
>>
>> Anil Patel sent the following on 2/23/2010 2:43 PM:
>>> This makes me think, What does a stable release mean to people?
>>>
>>> Ofbiz is such a big software with so many different ways of using it, for
>>> me its nearly impossible to say with confidence that its ready for release.
>>> Instead I will prefer to say, "We have tested following processes in Ofbiz
>>> and found them working ok".
>>>
>>> Are users of Ofbiz interested in helping with building list of Business
>>> Processes that they will like to see tested and declared functional. If you
>>> (users) help build the list, this will ensure that you get what you want.
>>>
>>> Following are good place to start:
>>>
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Universal+Business+Process+Library+Index
>>>
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/OFBiz+EZBiz
>>>
>>> Essentially I am asking users to help build acceptance test documents. You
>>> (users) decide what you will take :)
>>>
>>> Does this make sense?
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards
>>> Anil Patel
>>> HotWax Media Inc
>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
>>>
>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>>
>>>> What I'm telling you is that we may never be at a completely stable
>>>> release, by your definition, unless we stop moving - which as I committer,
>>>> I do not think will ever happen. What I can say is that we would like to
>>>> make branch - and stabilize it - and by some chance - get to a point where
>>>> we might have a proper release. Does that sound interesting to you?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ruppert
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tim:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm hardly ever "right". And with all due respect, could we just stick to
>>>>> the original topic?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to clear the air and set the record straight: What I was asking for
>>>>> was a clear and unambiguous statement from the project concerning what is
>>>>> meant by "stable release" so that non-committers can choose for
>>>>> themselves which release and/or trunk version they wish to get started
>>>>> with.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>>>>> Many, many committers continually add bug fixes to releases - check the
>>>>>> commit logs. I can't speak for everyone, but I think that many of us
>>>>>> are sitting here waiting for a new release so that this can become more
>>>>>> of the process that people are pushing - including trying to encourage
>>>>>> people to use the releases - instead of just the trunk - which seemed to
>>>>>> be something you were asking for earlier.
>>>>>> So, be behind this - it's in your best interests and what you've been
>>>>>> clamoring for - instead of just trying to be "right" all of the time ....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Anil:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about a recent thread called "Rethinking our release strategy"
>>>>>>> dated Feb 15th, 2010 which I shall partially repeat here for your
>>>>>>> convenience:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * because of this, no real maintenance plan, test strategy etc..
>>>>>>> has been created around it (9.04) from the community of users and
>>>>>>> interested parties (in fact we were not really able to officially
>>>>>>> release it)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * a lot of new users start eveluating OFBiz from that instead of
>>>>>>> the trunk
>>>>>>>> * it is rather old, several new features are missing and also
>>>>>>> code improvements (that could fix bugs etc)
>>>>>>>> I thought all the bug fixes were retrofitted to the release? Is this
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> true?
>>>>>>>> * because of this, it tends to be less stable than the trunk
>>>>>>>> How could the release be less stable than the trunk if bug fixes are
>>>>>>> applied to the release and the trunk?
>>>>>>>> The main cons of this situations are the following:
>>>>>>>> 1) not real interest in maintaining a release branch means that
>>>>>>> we will not be able to spend time on it and officially release it:
>>>>>>> the OFBiz community will miss the advantage of using the marketing
>>>>>>> channel represented by a new release
>>>>>>>> 2) new users will get the wrong impression that the project is
>>>>>>> slowing improving if they just get the releases
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For a true sense of the thread, please see this quote in context. I'll
>>>>>>> give you a hint, no one from the project came out and said that bug
>>>>>>> fixes are applied to Releases. The implication (and thus non-statement)
>>>>>>> is that the "trunk" is it as far as bug fixes are concerned.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anil Patel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ruth,
>>>>>>>> I don't know which statement are you talking about. Can you please put
>>>>>>>> that statement or non-statement here for ready reference? Thanks and
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Anil Patel
>>>>>>>> HotWax Media Inc
>>>>>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Doesn't this contradict previous statements or non-statements about
>>>>>>>>> bug fixes in Release 9.04?
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Ruth
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> David E Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One quick thing to note, that seems to be confused here: the release
>>>>>>>>>> branch is a tool for stabilization. It's great to do testing and
>>>>>>>>>> fixing in the trunk, but the goal for a release branch is not to be
>>>>>>>>>> tested and bug-free from day one, but rather to be stable so that
>>>>>>>>>> real testing and bug fixing can be done in the release branch
>>>>>>>>>> without worrying about new things possibly breaking something, or
>>>>>>>>>> any other conflicting priorities.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Makes sense to me. If we are decided on date, we still have a month
>>>>>>>>>>> to go. Gives plenty of time, may be :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Anil Patel
>>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media Inc
>>>>>>>>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice to get the new security code included in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> branch - even if it is disabled. That will give release users an
>>>>>>>>>>>> introduction to it and give them a chance to work on an upgrade
>>>>>>>>>>>> strategy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anil Patel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, are we set for next Ofbiz Branch named 10.04 ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we decide on _date_, I can have a team of developers scheduled
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start testing branch code. This will allow to quickly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stabilize ofbiz release for common ecommerce use.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about EOD March 31st 10 GMT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anil Patel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media Inc
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ofbiz"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 15, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree but after Jacopo's message on dev ML about new release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strategy (on which I mostly agree) I will at least delay it...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In order to have this kind of issue scheduling could you please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a new OFBIZ version in jira and set the Fix Version of these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not see any clearer way to answer to Ashish question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Bruno
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/2/15 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expect to fulfill
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3445
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other word to use layer lookups instead of popup lookups
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible in OFBiz.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my 1st serie of tests it seems to work well almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere, WIP...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think its time to start thinking on the things that should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be taken
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> care in / before release branch 10.04.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bug fixing should be the major area which should be taken care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extensively in next two months.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about new features etc. etc.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ashish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:47 AM, David E Jones <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no set date yet. The last release was in April 2009
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (hence the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version number of 09.04 on it), and the one before that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about 2 years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before. Chances are it won't be another 2 years before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another release, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably at least a year... so perhaps we'll do another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release branch in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around 4 months.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Juan Pablo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Community.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing the last trunk version and the demo version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet (http://demo.ofbiz.org). They've got new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality: help on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line, new themes, new features in accounting, manufacturing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ordermgr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> components. The last stable versión is actually 9.04. So,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ¿When will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ofbiz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try a new stable release version?.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gracias/Thank You.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Juan Pablo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>
>
