Thanks Erwan for your contributions to the Jira also your test report. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3511
========================= BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Suppilier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro> BJ Freeman sent the following on 2/24/2010 10:07 AM: > assuming every user provide a selenium script of what they do to build a > library for testing, where could we put these. Maybe a jira? > > > BJ Freeman sent the following on 2/24/2010 8:09 AM: >> Thanks I guess it is time to think about changing over from my Windows >> based testing tool to selenium. >> found some youtube tutorials. >> under >> selenium testing >> Maybe make some video on ofbiz to get more involvement. >> >> see what i can salvage. >> I guess to make the java code so can fit into the Junit tests framework. >> >> >> Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 2/24/2010 12:19 AM: >>> Hi BJ, >>> >>> Then Selenium should be the way... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "BJ Freeman" <[email protected]> >>>> Those type of tests were not what I had in mind. >>>> they are modular so are not dependent on the previous modules. >>>> first the order is read in using all the services that would be used to >>>> receive an order, no stuffing data into an entity. >>>> >>>> >>>> I am talking about starting with a order then doing all the operation >>>> till it is complete then checking the GL to see if it has correct amount. >>>> >>>> the data I use has also been run through an accounting application in >>>> parallel to match the results. >>>> >>>> for the whole year the test unit reads in orders stored in files. >>>> checking the GL data as each order is completed. The test takes a couple >>>> of weeks. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Anil Patel sent the following on 2/23/2010 4:16 PM: >>>>> Look for contents in >>>>> OrderTest.xml >>>>> accountingtests.xml >>>>> invoicetests.xml >>>>> paymenttests.xml >>>>> >>>>> Please give details what is not covered here and you will like see >>>>> added. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>> Anil Patel >>>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 6:45 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> can you give me a lead in to those, what is the top Junit for those >>>>>> three. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anil Patel sent the following on 2/23/2010 2:54 PM: >>>>>>> BJ, >>>>>>> All these work OOTB even today. Will you take that statement? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We need real details that will allow writing Unit Tests and >>>>>>> Selenium tests and at times have developer do tests and be able to >>>>>>> reproduce results. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>>>> Anil Patel >>>>>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 5:49 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the top level tests >>>>>>>> 1) does an order, that is complete, come out in the GL properly >>>>>>>> 2) same for Purchase Order. >>>>>>>> 3) does a years worth for transactions balance. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anil Patel sent the following on 2/23/2010 2:43 PM: >>>>>>>>> This makes me think, What does a stable release mean to people? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ofbiz is such a big software with so many different ways of using >>>>>>>>> it, for me its nearly impossible to say with confidence that its >>>>>>>>> ready for release. Instead I will prefer to say, "We have tested >>>>>>>>> following processes in Ofbiz and found them working ok". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Are users of Ofbiz interested in helping with building list of >>>>>>>>> Business Processes that they will like to see tested and declared >>>>>>>>> functional. If you (users) help build the list, this will ensure >>>>>>>>> that you get what you want. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Following are good place to start: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Universal+Business+Process+Library+Index >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/OFBiz+EZBiz >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Essentially I am asking users to help build acceptance test >>>>>>>>> documents. You (users) decide what you will take :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does this make sense? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>>>>>> Anil Patel >>>>>>>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>>>>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What I'm telling you is that we may never be at a completely >>>>>>>>>> stable release, by your definition, unless we stop moving - >>>>>>>>>> which as I committer, I do not think will ever happen. What I >>>>>>>>>> can say is that we would like to make branch - and stabilize it >>>>>>>>>> - and by some chance - get to a point where we might have a >>>>>>>>>> proper release. Does that sound interesting to you? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Ruppert >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tim: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm hardly ever "right". And with all due respect, could we >>>>>>>>>>> just stick to the original topic? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just to clear the air and set the record straight: What I was >>>>>>>>>>> asking for was a clear and unambiguous statement from the >>>>>>>>>>> project concerning what is meant by "stable release" so that >>>>>>>>>>> non-committers can choose for themselves which release and/or >>>>>>>>>>> trunk version they wish to get started with. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Ruth >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Many, many committers continually add bug fixes to releases - >>>>>>>>>>>> check the commit logs. I can't speak for everyone, but I >>>>>>>>>>>> think that many of us are sitting here waiting for a new >>>>>>>>>>>> release so that this can become more of the process that >>>>>>>>>>>> people are pushing - including trying to encourage people to >>>>>>>>>>>> use the releases - instead of just the trunk - which seemed to >>>>>>>>>>>> be something you were asking for earlier. >>>>>>>>>>>> So, be behind this - it's in your best interests and what >>>>>>>>>>>> you've been clamoring for - instead of just trying to be >>>>>>>>>>>> "right" all of the time .... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> Ruppert >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Anil: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How about a recent thread called "Rethinking our release >>>>>>>>>>>>> strategy" dated Feb 15th, 2010 which I shall partially repeat >>>>>>>>>>>>> here for your convenience: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * because of this, no real maintenance plan, test strategy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.. >>>>>>>>>>>>> has been created around it (9.04) from the community of users >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> interested parties (in fact we were not really able to >>>>>>>>>>>>> officially >>>>>>>>>>>>> release it) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * a lot of new users start eveluating OFBiz from that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the trunk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * it is rather old, several new features are missing and also >>>>>>>>>>>>> code improvements (that could fix bugs etc) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought all the bug fixes were retrofitted to the release? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this not >>>>>>>>>>>>> true? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * because of this, it tends to be less stable than the trunk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How could the release be less stable than the trunk if bug >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes are >>>>>>>>>>>>> applied to the release and the trunk? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The main cons of this situations are the following: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) not real interest in maintaining a release branch means that >>>>>>>>>>>>> we will not be able to spend time on it and officially >>>>>>>>>>>>> release it: >>>>>>>>>>>>> the OFBiz community will miss the advantage of using the >>>>>>>>>>>>> marketing >>>>>>>>>>>>> channel represented by a new release >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) new users will get the wrong impression that the project is >>>>>>>>>>>>> slowing improving if they just get the releases >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For a true sense of the thread, please see this quote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> context. I'll give you a hint, no one from the project came >>>>>>>>>>>>> out and said that bug fixes are applied to Releases. The >>>>>>>>>>>>> implication (and thus non-statement) is that the "trunk" is >>>>>>>>>>>>> it as far as bug fixes are concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ruth >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anil Patel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ruth, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know which statement are you talking about. Can you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> please put that statement or non-statement here for ready >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference? Thanks and Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anil Patel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ofbiz" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't this contradict previous statements or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-statements about bug fixes in Release 9.04? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ruth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David E Jones wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One quick thing to note, that seems to be confused here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release branch is a tool for stabilization. It's great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do testing and fixing in the trunk, but the goal for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release branch is not to be tested and bug-free from day >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one, but rather to be stable so that real testing and bug >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing can be done in the release branch without worrying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about new things possibly breaking something, or any other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicting priorities. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Anil Patel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Makes sense to me. If we are decided on date, we still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a month to go. Gives plenty of time, may be :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anil Patel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keyword "ofbiz" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice to get the new security code included >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the branch - even if it is disabled. That will give >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release users an introduction to it and give them a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chance to work on an upgrade strategy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Adrian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anil Patel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, are we set for next Ofbiz Branch named 10.04 ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we decide on _date_, I can have a team of developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scheduled to start testing branch code. This will allow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to quickly stabilize ofbiz release for common ecommerce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about EOD March 31st 10 GMT? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anil Patel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keyword "ofbiz" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 15, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree but after Jacopo's message on dev ML about new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release strategy (on which I mostly agree) I will at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least delay it... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In order to have this kind of issue scheduling could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please create >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a new OFBIZ version in jira and set the Fix Version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of these issue on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not see any clearer way to answer to Ashish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Bruno >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/2/15 Jacques Le Roux >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expect to fulfill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3445 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other word to use layer lookups instead of popup >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lookups everywhere it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible in OFBiz. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my 1st serie of tests it seems to work well >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost everywhere, WIP... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think its time to start thinking on the things >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that should be taken >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> care in / before release branch 10.04. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bug fixing should be the major area which should be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken care >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extensively in next two months. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about new features etc. etc.? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please comment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ashish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:47 AM, David E Jones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no set date yet. The last release was in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> April 2009 (hence the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version number of 09.04 on it), and the one before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was about 2 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before. Chances are it won't be another 2 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before another release, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably at least a year... so perhaps we'll do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another release branch in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around 4 months. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Juan Pablo wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Community. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing the last trunk version and the demo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version published in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet (http://demo.ofbiz.org). They've got new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality: help on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line, new themes, new features in accounting, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manufacturing and ordermgr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> components. The last stable versión is actually >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9.04. So, ¿When will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ofbiz >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try a new stable release version?. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gracias/Thank You. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Juan Pablo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> > >
