Take a look at sage. btw they are doing a lot of advertising right now.
Shi Jinghai sent the following on 2/24/2010 12:39 PM: > I think this discussion is unnecessary. > > Ruth is an audience. I guess she wants to see exciting shows, fighting, > blooding. > > Unfortunately, the open source game is not that exciting for end users. > > Why OFBiz will win this game? > Very simple, making all the talents to develop in one location is much > expensive than OFBiz current development model. > > > 在 2010-02-24三的 13:10 -0700，David E Jones写道： >> On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >> >>> I'm replying to the list in general regarding the misrepresentations and >>> outright lies in this reply - not Ruth personally... >>> >>> Ruth Hoffman wrote: >>>> Secondly, OFBiz will never survive, let alone grow, if there are no new >>>> adopters (end-users, service providers or whatever you want to call them). >>>> I further argue that the project won't get any new adopters by sticking >>>> its collective head in the sand and ignoring real world issues like >>>> release management, quality control and my favorite, documentation and >>>> training. >>> Before anyone on the list believes any of this nonsense, I would encourage >>> you to do a quick review of recent mailing list activity, the commit logs, >>> and Jira. >>> >>> A review of the user mailing list will show that new adopters arrive on >>> this list regularly. Release management follows a well documented plan and >>> that plan has been followed by the developer community. The commit logs >>> will show tremendous activity in the area of quality control (unit tests). >>> A review of Jira will show that bug reports are reviewed and fixed >>> regularly. There is a wealth of documentation on the Wiki, and in video and >>> book form. >>> >>> In summary, the project continues to grow and improve. No one has their >>> head stuck in the sand. Anyone who says otherwise is simply ignoring the >>> facts. >> Thank you for a voice of reason Adrian. >> >> Usually when people ignore the facts and make assertions otherwise, >> especially when done vehemently and repeatedly, there is something they are >> trying to get other people to believe, and along with that something they >> think people will do if they believe it. >> >> What I'm wondering about Ruth's comments over recent weeks is: >> >> 1. What is it that Ruth wants us to believe? >> 2. What is it that Ruth wants us to do based on that belief? >> >> Ruth: could you help us out here? >> >> Otherwise, I guess we can start guessing... >> >> -David >> > >
