On 10/07/2010, at 1:06 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: > a product is more of a marketing item > a part is a description of a function > they vary for engineering and manufacturing. Engineering does not assign a > commercial product to the part where manufacture may list many actual > purchase parts that will never be sold individually. > I see in the model book the one I implemented is the alternative and more > extensive model.
Congratulations, where can I download a copy of this BJBiz? Please try and keep in mind that we are discussing OFBiz in this mailing list, not your derivative of it. > > Scott Gray sent the following on 7/5/2010 5:53 PM: >> In OFBiz a Part is a Product, so what is your point? >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> On 6/07/2010, at 12:16 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: >> >>> I wish to be able to have our engineers link plans to parts >>> >>> ========================= >>> BJ Freeman<http://bjfreeman.elance.com> >>> >> [snip] >> >> BTW your quoting is terrible, I never made the statement below >>> Scott Gray sent the following on 7/5/2010 5:02 PM: >>>> I wish to be able to have our engineers link plans to parts >>> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
