my goal has always been to have this ofbiz do this. it has never been my
intent to have a seperate ofbiz. Nor am I promoting mine.
my problem up to now has been acceptance and resources.
I see the winds changing on acceptance and I have gotten the resources.
if you note I suggest years ago to have contributor branches.
Had that happened I would have contributed to it instead of create mine.
I see the equivalent of contributor branch happening more like the
Current Hippo branch.
so if someone wants to open a branch I can just submit to, it would be
faster, however i am happy to provide Jiras.
so if the Jiras I put patches in are accepted then the ofbiz will work
the same as the one I have.
Note my first major move to accomplish this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3852
Scott Gray sent the following on 7/9/2010 5:18 PM:
On 10/07/2010, at 1:06 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
a product is more of a marketing item
a part is a description of a function
they vary for engineering and manufacturing. Engineering does not assign a
commercial product to the part where manufacture may list many actual purchase
parts that will never be sold individually.
I see in the model book the one I implemented is the alternative and more
extensive model.
Congratulations, where can I download a copy of this BJBiz? Please try and
keep in mind that we are discussing OFBiz in this mailing list, not your
derivative of it.
Scott Gray sent the following on 7/5/2010 5:53 PM:
In OFBiz a Part is a Product, so what is your point?
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 6/07/2010, at 12:16 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
I wish to be able to have our engineers link plans to parts
=========================
BJ Freeman<http://bjfreeman.elance.com>
[snip]
BTW your quoting is terrible, I never made the statement below
Scott Gray sent the following on 7/5/2010 5:02 PM:
I wish to be able to have our engineers link plans to parts
