You disappoint me as a technical person that you do not see the benefit of being able to easily merge changes back in the branch what is not possible in sourceforge etc...
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 17:27 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > What need would contributor branches meet that can't already be met using the > likes of sourceforge, google code or github? > > Regarding your other statements, at some point Hans you are going to need to > ask yourself why it is mostly only your commits that cause so much negative > discussion. Everyone else seems to work together just fine for the most > part. I'm not saying it's all your fault but you can't just blame everyone > else for these problems and ignore your own contribution to them. > > Regards > Scott > > On 10/07/2010, at 2:54 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > I have the same opinion as you BJ, even as a committer it is too much > > problem contributing because of the number of technical people in the > > PMC which often only judge on technical qualities and making the system > > technically as difficult as possible. > > > > The current discussion (not really sure if it is one) between Adrian and > > me is a good example. > > > > I think it would be a good idea to have contributor branches. Other PMC > > members who would support this? > > > > To be honest i think that you should try to become a committer, i know > > why you did not accept in the past, but please reconsider. > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > > > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 18:33 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote: > >> my goal has always been to have this ofbiz do this. it has never been my > >> intent to have a seperate ofbiz. Nor am I promoting mine. > >> my problem up to now has been acceptance and resources. > >> I see the winds changing on acceptance and I have gotten the resources. > >> if you note I suggest years ago to have contributor branches. > >> Had that happened I would have contributed to it instead of create mine. > >> I see the equivalent of contributor branch happening more like the > >> Current Hippo branch. > >> so if someone wants to open a branch I can just submit to, it would be > >> faster, however i am happy to provide Jiras. > >> so if the Jiras I put patches in are accepted then the ofbiz will work > >> the same as the one I have. > >> Note my first major move to accomplish this > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3852 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Scott Gray sent the following on 7/9/2010 5:18 PM: > >>> On 10/07/2010, at 1:06 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: > >>> > >>>> a product is more of a marketing item > >>>> a part is a description of a function > >>>> they vary for engineering and manufacturing. Engineering does not assign > >>>> a commercial product to the part where manufacture may list many actual > >>>> purchase parts that will never be sold individually. > >>>> I see in the model book the one I implemented is the alternative and > >>>> more extensive model. > >>> > >>> Congratulations, where can I download a copy of this BJBiz? Please try > >>> and keep in mind that we are discussing OFBiz in this mailing list, not > >>> your derivative of it. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Scott Gray sent the following on 7/5/2010 5:53 PM: > >>>>> In OFBiz a Part is a Product, so what is your point? > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> Scott > >>>>> > >>>>> HotWax Media > >>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>>>> > >>>>> On 6/07/2010, at 12:16 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I wish to be able to have our engineers link plans to parts > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ========================= > >>>>>> BJ Freeman<http://bjfreeman.elance.com> > >>>>>> > >>>>> [snip] > >>>>> > >>>>> BTW your quoting is terrible, I never made the statement below > >>>>>> Scott Gray sent the following on 7/5/2010 5:02 PM: > >>>>>>> I wish to be able to have our engineers link plans to parts > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > > > > -- > > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > > > -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
