how about an svn log comment that says see the shark if your interested.
that way if someone runs across it they may get interested, but if put
away it is more like out of sight out of mind.
However if you get drool implemented and in the trunk or I get the
business Basic integrated, I can see removing the Shark and all files
related.
chris snow sent the following on 9/19/2010 12:28 PM:
Hi BJ, keeping old stuff around makes the framework harder to master.
Could the file be archived somewhere? That way, it's clear to users
that it isn't important, but is still around if someone wants to
finish off the functionality.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:22 PM, BJ Freeman<[email protected]> wrote:
there seems to be a movement to remove a lot of "unused" stuff.
I my personal value is that this is a community and as we grow some one may
take an interest.
so only things that have been superseded should be removed.
like if there is a business language interface that has been implemented.
chris snow sent the following on 9/19/2010 12:11 PM:
Is there any value in keeping files like these if they aren't used?
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM, BJ Freeman<[email protected]> wrote:
Shark is disabled, since the integration was not completed.
See the Shark container.
chris snow sent the following on 9/19/2010 11:39 AM:
Is orderProcessXPDL.xml used by anything in Ofbiz? if so, where and
how?
Many thanks,
Chris
