svn log sounds good - will you be deleted this and other deprecated files now?
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:41 PM, BJ Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > how about an svn log comment that says see the shark if your interested. > that way if someone runs across it they may get interested, but if put away > it is more like out of sight out of mind. > However if you get drool implemented and in the trunk or I get the business > Basic integrated, I can see removing the Shark and all files related. > > > > chris snow sent the following on 9/19/2010 12:28 PM: >> >> Hi BJ, keeping old stuff around makes the framework harder to master. >> Could the file be archived somewhere? That way, it's clear to users >> that it isn't important, but is still around if someone wants to >> finish off the functionality. >> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:22 PM, BJ Freeman<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> there seems to be a movement to remove a lot of "unused" stuff. >>> I my personal value is that this is a community and as we grow some one >>> may >>> take an interest. >>> so only things that have been superseded should be removed. >>> like if there is a business language interface that has been implemented. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> chris snow sent the following on 9/19/2010 12:11 PM: >>>> >>>> Is there any value in keeping files like these if they aren't used? >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM, BJ Freeman<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Shark is disabled, since the integration was not completed. >>>>> See the Shark container. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> chris snow sent the following on 9/19/2010 11:39 AM: >>>>>> >>>>>> Is orderProcessXPDL.xml used by anything in Ofbiz? if so, where and >>>>>> how? >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
