Thanks Al.  More than anything we need PMC members who are helping the project 
rather than hurting it.

Regards
Scott

On 31/05/2013, at 10:13 PM, Al Byers wrote:

> Valid point, Scott. I have offered to resign years ago as I am not active,
> but no one took me up on it. Sounds like you need project management that
> requires active PMC members. I will send my resignation request to the pmc
> list where this conversation should probably take place.
> 
> -Al
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Scott Gray <scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com>wrote:
> 
>> Al,
>> 
>> Privately or not, if this is how you intend to interact with OFBiz users
>> by actively encouraging them to switch to the competing framework that
>> you're currently working with, then I'd strongly encourage you to resign
>> from the OFBiz PMC.  It's really not the type of project management we need.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Scott
>> 
>> On 22/05/2013, at 10:26 PM, Al Byers wrote:
>> 
>>> I feel like I owe another apology to the OFBiz developers. Though my
>>> initial remarks were accidental (and embarrassing), I was wrong not to
>>> acknowledge that OFBiz has a wealth of functionality that Moqui does not
>>> approach at this time. And my lack of first hand knowledge of all the
>> work
>>> that has gone into upgrading OFBiz is no excuse for not acknowledging
>> that.
>>> I know that I will need and want to use OFBiz for the rest of my career
>> and
>>> those who have put so much effort into making it the valuable product
>> that
>>> it is should be commended, for they will never get full payback for their
>>> work. Thanks for all that you have done.
>>> 
>>> - Al Byers
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> From: "Al Byers" <bye...@automationgroups.com>
>>>>> Sorry Adrian,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Had my mind on too many things and didn't mean to send it to the list.
>>>> But
>>>>> then, a dose of "open mike" might be refreshing. I know that there are
>>>> some
>>>>> great developers on OFBiz, but sometimes things get too large to
>> refactor
>>>>> and a fresh start is better.
>>>> 
>>>> This was already discussed indeed. This option is still open. On the
>> other
>>>> hand, after more than a decade, I believe OFBiz is even better.
>>>> For almost 3 years now we are less including new features and more
>> fixing
>>>> what exists.
>>>> Notably in the framewors itself, where a replacement by Moqui makes more
>>>> sense.
>>>> We are even removing unused stuff, sometimes too harshly said Skip
>>>> recently, nobody's perfect.
>>>> 
>>>>> I don't think American car manufacturers were really concerned about
>>>>> improving their product until the Japanese came along. And, even then,
>> I
>>>>> don't think that they have become competitive except to the extent that
>>>>> they have pushed the "reset" button.
>>>> 
>>>> In French we say "comparaison n'est pas raison". Don't try to translate
>>>> with Google (again lost in translation). But I guess you can get it
>> without.
>>>> 
>>>>> It is not reasonable to think that OFBiz will just make the next
>> release
>>>> on
>>>>> Moqui, but it seems like there could be a vanguard interested in
>> making a
>>>>> port.
>>>> 
>>>> I think nobody is against it. As you say this would be a long, or maybe
>>>> medium, term goal.
>>>> OFBiz is considered stable now. Replacing the framework with Moqui would
>>>> certainly take some time before acquiring the same level of stability
>>>> 
>>>> Jacques
>>>> PS: thanks Adrian for your defense of the team
>>>> 
>>>>> -Al
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Adrian Crum <
>>>>> adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> A quick clarification on this.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "OFBiz was brilliant when David created it over ten years ago, but..."
>>>>>> implies OFBiz is no longer brilliant. OFBiz continues to be just as
>>>>>> brilliant, with a talented team of developers keeping it current with
>>>>>> current technology.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 5/20/2013 4:04 PM, Al Byers wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am just starting to look around for OFBiz work and was intrigued to
>>>> see
>>>>>>> your email there this morning. I have been working with OFBiz for
>> over
>>>> 10
>>>>>>> years now and am interested in what you have going.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But I must ask if you have considered Moqui (moqui.org <
>>>> http://moqui.org>)
>>>>>>> - David Jones's successor to OFBiz? I was just at a small conference
>>>> with
>>>>>>> David and the folks at HowWax Media and based on David's comments and
>>>> what
>>>>>>> I know about Moqui from my past year of working with it, if you are
>>>>>>> starting anew, and especially if you are not using the current
>>>> e-commerce
>>>>>>> features of OFBiz, then you would be well served to look at Moqui.
>>>> OFBiz
>>>>>>> was brilliant when David created it over ten years ago, but
>> technology
>>>> has
>>>>>>> made great advances in that time and if you have the freedom to do
>> so,
>>>> it
>>>>>>> makes sense to start with the latest base.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have attached David's introduction to Moqui PDF, which I don't
>> think
>>>> is
>>>>>>> readily available off the moqui.org <http://moqui.org> website.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I hope to hear from you soon.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Al Byers
>>>>>>> 801-400-5111
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Carlos Cruz <
>> car...@nbtbizcapital.com
>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>> carlos@nbtbizcapital.**com <car...@nbtbizcapital.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Hi;
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   I'm looking for a Java programmer that is familiar with OFBiz.
>>>>>>>   Particularly with OFBiz Web Services and OFBiz Entity Engine.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   I'm interested in hosting OFBiz for some very specific industries
>>>>>>>   and I want to develop some very specific interfaces.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   This is a long term project, I could be flexible with the hours.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   If you're interested email me for more details.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Also feel free to forward this email to someone you think might be
>>>>>>>   interested.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Thanks!!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Carlos
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   logo-for-social-media-sites-**email_signature
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   CruzControl Radius
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Your Success Is Our Service
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   www.ccradius.com <http://www.ccradius.com>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   email:car...@ccradius.com <mailto:email%3Acarlos@**ccradius.com<
>>>> email%253acar...@ccradius.com>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   1-877-285-5499 <tel:1-877-285-5499>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to