Christian,

Sharan Foga did an update on the book regarding Manufacturing with OFBiz.

It can be found here:

http://www.lulu.com/shop/sharan-foga/getting-started-with-apache-ofbiz-manufacturing-mrp/paperback/product-21280140.html
<
http://www.lulu.com/shop/sharan-foga/getting-started-with-apache-ofbiz-manufacturing-mrp/paperback/product-21280140.html
>

Unfortunately, the list of books in cwiki isn't up to date. Otherwise you
would have found the reference there as well.




Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Christian Carlow <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks again Pierre,
>
> Once I created separate routings to which the sub-parts were linked, the
> separate routings were included as dependent production runs with their own
> set of sub-part materials.
>
> Does anyone know if there exists any documentation out there on using the
> Manufacturing application like this?  I found some documentation on
> Opentaps wiki but it doesn't really describe the steps that need to be
> performed.  I also looked at "Getting Started with Apache OFBiz
> Manufacturing & MRP in 5 easy steps" but it only covered single-level BOMs
> (maybe the full book covers multi-level BOMs?).
>
> The best thing I found was this thread from 2007:
> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Question-on-Rouning-tasks-td143884.html.
> The thread explains using Routing Task "Deliverable Products" only for
> non-standard results because its a manual process, otherwise the "cascading
> structure/network of production runs (routings)" should be used.  The
> thread also mentions creating a wiki page for the subject.  I guess this
> still needs to be done?
>
>
> On 01/21/2014 07:29 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>
>> Christian,
>>
>> To be correct: you don't need to do the 'dependent' production runs. That
>> is a choice.
>>
>> But yes, if you have specific tasks for the production of your
>> sub-products
>> you would be better of with specific production schemas. Otherwise, the
>> 'default' schema will be used.
>>
>> Pierre Smits
>>
>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
>> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
>> Based Manufacturing, Professional
>> Services and Retail & Trade
>> http://www.orrtiz.com
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Christian Carlow <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  Thanks Pierre,
>>>
>>> To clarify, you're saying that the sub-products need their own separate
>>> routing as well and using "dependent production run" will include those
>>> sub-product routings?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/21/2014 03:06 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Christian,
>>>>
>>>> That is correct. If the end product consist of parts (sub products) that
>>>> you produce also, you also need to have a bom and a production schema
>>>> (with
>>>> tasks and product association) for sub products.
>>>>
>>>> When creating a production run for the end product, you can
>>>> automatically
>>>> create the production runs for the sub products by setting the
>>>> 'dependent
>>>> production run' flag in the production run for the end product.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Pierre Smits
>>>>
>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
>>>>
>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional
>>>> Services and Retail & Trade
>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Christian Carlow <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   When I run a production run routing for a product with BOM levels
>>>> greater
>>>>
>>>>> than 1, the lower level materials are not listed in the Materials List
>>>>> screenlet.  Are separate routing required for each BOM level?
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, with BOM
>>>>>       part_1
>>>>>           part_1_1
>>>>>               rawpart_1_1
>>>>>           part_1_2
>>>>>               rawpart_1_2
>>>>>
>>>>> I created a Routing called part_1 to which part_1 is linked as the
>>>>> product.  When I create a production run, only part_1_1 and part_1_2
>>>>> are
>>>>> listed as materials.  Shouldn't rawpart_1_1 and rawpart_1_2 be listed
>>>>> in
>>>>> the materials list also?  I even linked routing tasks to the BOMs but
>>>>> it
>>>>> didn't pull in the additional materials.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Reply via email to