First of all, everything published on a publication means of the Foundation (regardless whether this is an 'official' site, a wiki or a mailing list) is in line with the principles of the ASF. If not, actions will be undertaken. By the ASF. Nowhere in the documents of the ASF it is stated that when a site is in a bad state (a mess as it has been called) it may not be linked.
As for contributing and calling yourself a contributor, the term contributor is official in the ASF documents and when persons provide comments, document enhancements or even participate in discussions they are contributing to the project. Again without any remark about the quality of the contribution, only that the contributions are improvements. What I read in the lines of Jacopo is veto. What I don't read is: 'I have my opinion about how it should be, but I am for finding a consensus to get this issue resolved'. And that is a pity. Because no matter what a project has as output or where its community wants it to go, according to the ASF it should always be 'Community over Code'. And so should this project be. Regards. Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com
