Hi Mayank,
It would seem more logical to me to decide about the naming convention for alignment classes after having decided which CSS framework we prefer to
refer for tables.
I see no hurry in that, do you have for another reason? If so then please start
the detailed comparison of the 2 CSS frameworks to help us to decide.
Thanks
Jacques
Le 09/09/2017 à 14:13, Mayank Lambhate a écrit :
Hello Jacques, All,
I think this would be a good idea to check which of the CSS styling in
either Bootstrap or Foundation works best for OFBiz tables.
Also coming to the original discussion of using specific classes for
alignment of table data, Can we pick the naming convention from Bootstrap
Alignment classes?
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.3/css/#type-alignment
<https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.3/css/#type-alignment>
Thanks,
*Mayank Lambhate* | Enterprise Software Engineer
HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Paul Mandeltort <[email protected]> wrote:
In the other thread, folks were talking about Vaadin which would supersede
this discussion, I believe.
For this application I think Vaadin (in particular the Grid component) is
an ideal fit, because it is a complete UI framework, vs Bootstrap which is
just a nice client-side CSS/JS theme.
Replacing the various obsolete implementations of tabular data display
with the Vaadin Grid component alone would make ofbiz an order of magnitude
more usable for most of its apps.
https://vaadin.com/docs/-/part/framework/components/components-grid.html
-P
On Sep 7, 2017, 3:29 AM -0500, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]>, wrote:
Hi Michael, All,
Why not Foundation?
It's true that Bootstrap, I guess due to its origin, is more widely
used, but Foundation has some arguments.
https://www.google.fr/search?q=Bootstrap+vs+Foundation&ie=UTF-8
Nnotably when it comes to tables that OFBiz uses a lot (please see
Rajesh's and my message before in the thread).
Beware, I don't mean to use Foundation as is, simply to refer to its CSS
definitions as Taher suggested for Bootstrap.
At least to compare both for OFBiz before picking one
Jacques
Le 07/09/2017 à 10:05, Michael Brohl a écrit :
A bit late to the party but I totally agree that we should make use of
an existing standard instead of reinventing our own wheel.
+1 for bootstrap
Regards,
Michael
Am 26.08.17 um 21:19 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb:
If I may suggest, I think we should go with something established and
not come up with our own CSS dictionary. So for example, we can
utilize pre-existing definitions from bootstrap [1]
[1] https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.3/css/#tables
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Mayank Lambhate
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello All,
The tables used in OFBiz currently don`t have any standard for
defining the
alignment of data inside the tables. IMO, following are the points
relevant
to alignment of data in tables -
1. Numeric data (Right Aligned)
2. Non-Numeric (Left Aligned)
3. Table headers to be aligned with the data.
Also, the names of classes used for aligning data are a bit
confusing. We
can come up with more generic names of the classes, also we can
define
certain classes that could be specific to the alignment of data
inside
tables.
Please let me know what you think about this.
Thanks and Regards
*Mayank Lambhate* | Enterprise Software Engineer
HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
