Hello, I agree with Deepak that we can define our own CSS classes based on the context and we can take the names from fieldtype*.xml.
I think once this is done, we can proceed with the comparison for UI frameworks to be used and the CSS classes would remain the same. I have created a ticket for the same. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9750 *Mayank Lambhate* | Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Deepak Dixit < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think instead of directly using bootstrap defined classes we can define > it based on context. > > Like for as we display amount/numeric values as right aligned, and for this > bootstrap has pull-right class. > pull-right does not make sense its to generic, we can define new classes to > meet ERP needs. > We can use ofbiz defined field type in fieldtype*,xml file for these kind > of field. > > This is an example where we can't use direct bootstrap classes so its good > to have our own definition. > > > > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > www.hotwaxsystems.com > www.hotwax.co > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Mayank, > > > > It would seem more logical to me to decide about the naming convention > for > > alignment classes after having decided which CSS framework we prefer to > > refer for tables. > > > > I see no hurry in that, do you have for another reason? If so then please > > start the detailed comparison of the 2 CSS frameworks to help us to > decide. > > > > Thanks > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > Le 09/09/2017 à 14:13, Mayank Lambhate a écrit : > > > >> Hello Jacques, All, > >> > >> I think this would be a good idea to check which of the CSS styling in > >> either Bootstrap or Foundation works best for OFBiz tables. > >> > >> Also coming to the original discussion of using specific classes for > >> alignment of table data, Can we pick the naming convention from > Bootstrap > >> Alignment classes? > >> > >> https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.3/css/#type-alignment > >> <https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.3/css/#type-alignment> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> *Mayank Lambhate* | Enterprise Software Engineer > >> HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Paul Mandeltort <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> In the other thread, folks were talking about Vaadin which would > supersede > >>> this discussion, I believe. > >>> > >>> For this application I think Vaadin (in particular the Grid component) > is > >>> an ideal fit, because it is a complete UI framework, vs Bootstrap which > >>> is > >>> just a nice client-side CSS/JS theme. > >>> > >>> Replacing the various obsolete implementations of tabular data display > >>> with the Vaadin Grid component alone would make ofbiz an order of > >>> magnitude > >>> more usable for most of its apps. > >>> > >>> https://vaadin.com/docs/-/part/framework/components/ > components-grid.html > >>> > >>> -P > >>> > >>> On Sep 7, 2017, 3:29 AM -0500, Jacques Le Roux < > >>> [email protected]>, wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Michael, All, > >>>> > >>>> Why not Foundation? > >>>> > >>>> It's true that Bootstrap, I guess due to its origin, is more widely > >>>> > >>> used, but Foundation has some arguments. > >>> > >>>> https://www.google.fr/search?q=Bootstrap+vs+Foundation&ie=UTF-8 > >>>> > >>>> Nnotably when it comes to tables that OFBiz uses a lot (please see > >>>> > >>> Rajesh's and my message before in the thread). > >>> > >>>> Beware, I don't mean to use Foundation as is, simply to refer to its > CSS > >>>> > >>> definitions as Taher suggested for Bootstrap. > >>> > >>>> At least to compare both for OFBiz before picking one > >>>> > >>>> Jacques > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Le 07/09/2017 à 10:05, Michael Brohl a écrit : > >>>> > >>>>> A bit late to the party but I totally agree that we should make use > of > >>>>> > >>>> an existing standard instead of reinventing our own wheel. > >>> > >>>> +1 for bootstrap > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Michael > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Am 26.08.17 um 21:19 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb: > >>>>> > >>>>>> If I may suggest, I think we should go with something established > and > >>>>>> not come up with our own CSS dictionary. So for example, we can > >>>>>> utilize pre-existing definitions from bootstrap [1] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.3/css/#tables > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Mayank Lambhate > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello All, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The tables used in OFBiz currently don`t have any standard for > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> defining the > >>> > >>>> alignment of data inside the tables. IMO, following are the points > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> relevant > >>> > >>>> to alignment of data in tables - > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1. Numeric data (Right Aligned) > >>>>>>> 2. Non-Numeric (Left Aligned) > >>>>>>> 3. Table headers to be aligned with the data. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Also, the names of classes used for aligning data are a bit > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> confusing. We > >>> > >>>> can come up with more generic names of the classes, also we can > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> define > >>> > >>>> certain classes that could be specific to the alignment of data > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> inside > >>> > >>>> tables. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please let me know what you think about this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks and Regards > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> *Mayank Lambhate* | Enterprise Software Engineer > >>>>>>> HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > > >
