Mohammed, If you are interested in this, let me know. There is a generic Jira in OPENEJB:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-62 This needs to be updated with more granular information on what needs to be done. Once you voice your interest, we will act accordingly. Take care, Jeremy On 11/9/05, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:32 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote: > > > On 10/26/05, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > > Either works. If you want to contribute to OpenEJB alone, you don't > > have > >> to bother with Geronimo pieces. There are lots of ways to contribute: > >> building the software yourself while reporting issues and documenting > >> bits are the most easiest. When you're done with it, you can start > >> contributing patches - take a look at OpenEJB JIRA - the issue report > >> system - and pick up the one you could have much fun with. > >> > >> Start simple with following documentation and see if it works. Ask > >> questions and voila, that's it. > >> > >> In the meantime, join #openejb channel on > >> irc.freenode.org<http://irc.freenode.org> > <http:// > >> irc.freenode.org <http://irc.freenode.org>>- we're > >> covering most of the TZs, so someone should always be there. > >> > >> > >> Jacek > > > > Sorry for too much questions, but which version to work with 1.0 or > > 2.0 ?, I > > already downloaded the source code of 1.0 and succeeded to build it > > and play > > with it, but I feel that version 2.0 is the one the OpenEJB is > > currently > > focusing on, so which one do you suggest? > > Hi Mohammed, > > I noticed this thread kind of slowed down and just wanted to throw my > 2c in hoping to get it started again. > > There is work to do on both 1.0 and 2.0. Both are important and both > will be included in OpenEJB 3.0 when that gets fully off the ground. > > Jeremy Whitlock is doing some work on the WebAdmin Console which is > our last box to check before we push out another 1.0. It would be > really great if you could help out there. Jeremy probably has more > details on what needs to be done. > > -David > >
