On 11/9/05, Jeremy Whitlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mohammed, > If you are interested in this, let me know. There is a generic Jira in > OPENEJB: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-62 > > This needs to be updated with more granular information on what needs to > be > done. Once you voice your interest, we will act accordingly. > > Take care, > Jeremy
----------------------------------------------------- Hi Jeremy... How are you? :), Sorry for being late to respond to your last note, I checked my mail yesterday only. Are you kidding, sure I am very interested. I got the latest snapshot from the CVS server following this command *cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scm/openejb co openejb1* And I built this snapshot successfully. Then I tested the webadmin client from my browser and it works fine without copying the *openejb-webadmin-main-XXXX.jar* file mentioned in *JIRA#**OPENEJB-62*<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-62>. So I need your feedback on this, to see if I did something wrong, or if I don't understand the JIRA comment very well, or really everything is OK as I found. Please I need your feedback ASAP. Best regards... *Mohammad Nour El-Din* ----------------------------------------------------- On 11/9/05, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:32 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote: > > > > > On 10/26/05, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > > > > Either works. If you want to contribute to OpenEJB alone, you don't > > > have > > >> to bother with Geronimo pieces. There are lots of ways to contribute: > > >> building the software yourself while reporting issues and documenting > > >> bits are the most easiest. When you're done with it, you can start > > >> contributing patches - take a look at OpenEJB JIRA - the issue report > > >> system - and pick up the one you could have much fun with. > > >> > > >> Start simple with following documentation and see if it works. Ask > > >> questions and voila, that's it. > > >> > > >> In the meantime, join #openejb channel on > > >> irc.freenode.org<http://irc.freenode.org> > <http://irc.freenode.org> > > <http:// > > >> irc.freenode.org <http://irc.freenode.org> <http://irc.freenode.org>>- > we're > > >> covering most of the TZs, so someone should always be there. > > >> > > >> > > >> Jacek > > > > > > Sorry for too much questions, but which version to work with 1.0 or > > > 2.0 ?, I > > > already downloaded the source code of 1.0 and succeeded to build it > > > and play > > > with it, but I feel that version 2.0 is the one the OpenEJB is > > > currently > > > focusing on, so which one do you suggest? > > > > Hi Mohammed, > > > > I noticed this thread kind of slowed down and just wanted to throw my > > 2c in hoping to get it started again. > > > > There is work to do on both 1.0 and 2.0. Both are important and both > > will be included in OpenEJB 3.0 when that gets fully off the ground. > > > > Jeremy Whitlock is doing some work on the WebAdmin Console which is > > our last box to check before we push out another 1.0. It would be > > really great if you could help out there. Jeremy probably has more > > details on what needs to be done. > > > > -David > > > > > >
