We are thinking that our soap services invocation code should be
configurable. For example, if detects that OM version is 3.1.2 then don't
call getSession method, call directly login method.

On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> hmm the version of OM itself ....
> we never has API call for this :(
> It can be easily added, but why do you need it?
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>
>> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns OM version from the
links you provided.
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I already provide you with number of links to start with ...
>> > do you need more :))
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil <
[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM version? If not, please
guide me how can I create one.
>> >> Thank you.
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are updated to work with new
REST services as expected
>> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :)
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be compatible with this
API ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> yep, Swagger :))
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just reduced the number of
requests required (2 against 3) :)
>> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and more compact :)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really good idea. Especially to
get a proper API document out. With Swagger you can embed example request
and responses a lot more easy.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed"
>> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method signatures have changed.
But the logical flow is the same.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>> Sebastian
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]
>:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> JFYI: http://cxf.markmail.org/thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document this
>> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise :((((
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add Swanger to REST ....
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF
>> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple groups error, user, group,
room recording etc.
>> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up
>> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now (and produces both
XML and JSON)
>> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I haven't added PUT)
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the REST
(GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is that the change?
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow are the same, right ?
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <
[email protected]>:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed here:
http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u)
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here
http://openmeetings.apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here:
http://openmeetings.apache.org/RestAPISample.html
>> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here:
https://github.com/openmeetings/openmeetings-api-plugin
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much documentation :(
>> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome :)
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bhushan Patil <
[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated older version of
Openmeetings with our application. At the time of migration to OM 3.1.2, we
realized that api are changed. We want to  keep old code as well as write
new code for newer APIs.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api which let us know
version of Openmeetings.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>>> WBR
>> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> --
>> >> >>>>>> WBR
>> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >>>>> WBR
>> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> --
>> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner
>> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >> >>>> [email protected]
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> --
>> >> >>> WBR
>> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Sebastian Wagner
>> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > WBR
>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to