How about 'getVersion' or 'getOMVersion' method in 'ServerWebService' ?
On Aug 19, 2016 9:08 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I can add it to 3.1.3, could you propose service name for this? > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bhushan Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We are thinking that our soap services invocation code should be configurable. For example, if detects that OM version is 3.1.2 then don't call getSession method, call directly login method. >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > hmm the version of OM itself .... >> > we never has API call for this :( >> > It can be easily added, but why do you need it? >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil < thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns OM version from the links you provided. >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > I already provide you with number of links to start with ... >> >> > do you need more :)) >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil < thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM version? If not, please guide me how can I create one. >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are updated to work with new REST services as expected >> >> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be compatible with this API ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < solomax...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> yep, Swagger :)) >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just reduced the number of requests required (2 against 3) :) >> >> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and more compact :) >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really good idea. Especially to get a proper API document out. With Swagger you can embed example request and responses a lot more easy. >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed" >> >> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method signatures have changed. But the logical flow is the same. >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < solomax...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> JFYI: http://cxf.markmail.org/thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document this >> >> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise :(((( >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add Swanger to REST .... >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF >> >> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple groups error, user, group, room recording etc. >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up >> >> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now (and produces both XML and JSON) >> >> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I haven't added PUT) >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the REST (GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is that the change? >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow are the same, right ? >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < solomax...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed here: http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u) >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here http://openmeetings.apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here: http://openmeetings.apache.org/RestAPISample.html >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here: https://github.com/openmeetings/openmeetings-api-plugin >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much documentation :( >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451 >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome :) >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bhushan Patil < thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated older version of Openmeetings with our application. At the time of migration to OM 3.1.2, we realized that api are changed. We want to keep old code as well as write new code for newer APIs. >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api which let us know version of Openmeetings. >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions? >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -- >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> -- >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >> >> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> >> >> >>>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >> >> >>>>>>> WBR >> >> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> -- >> >> >> >>>>>> WBR >> >> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> -- >> >> >> >>>>> WBR >> >> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> -- >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner >> >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> >> >> >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >> >>> WBR >> >> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Sebastian Wagner >> >> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> >> >> >> seba.wag...@gmail.com >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > WBR >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > WBR >> >> > Maxim aka solomax >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > WBR >> > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax
