OK, implemented, you can test it using fresh nightly build
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> ok :)
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Bhushan Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I think "Object with fields" will have more readability as we can
>> retrieve particular info from key instead of index.
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2016 11:59 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > yep it is OK :)
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > how would you like to get revision and build date?
>> > as Object with fields
>> > {
>> > version: 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT,
>> > revision: xxxxxxxxxx,
>> > buildDate: 2016-08-19
>> > }
>> >
>> > as (list of Strings)
>> > ["3.1.3-SNAPSHOT", "xxxxxxxxxx", "2016-08-19"]
>> >
>> > via additional method(s) ?
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Bhushan Patil <
>> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Maxim, I created the issue, will you check it and see if it is
>> correctly done?
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:56 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Service is ready to be committed :)
>> >> > waiting for the issue :)))
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Bhushan Patil <
>> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:33 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Do you need only version?
>> >> >> > revision and buildDate can also be retrieved
>> >> >> Yes, I currently need only version but I think we should also
>> provided revision n buildDate.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> could you please create JIRA issue?
>> >> >> Yes, I will create it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Bhushan Patil <
>> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Seems great. Thanks.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Aug 19, 2016 9:21 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > ServerWebService is actually for manging cluster servers ....
>> >> >> >>> > I'm afraid additional service is required here like
>> InfoWebService ....
>> >> >> >>> > with SOAP method getVersion
>> >> >> >>> > with REST method GET /info/version
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bhushan Patil <
>> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> How about 'getVersion' or 'getOMVersion' method in
>> 'ServerWebService' ?
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:08 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > I can add it to 3.1.3, could you propose service name for
>> this?
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bhushan Patil <
>> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> We are thinking that our soap services invocation code
>> should be configurable. For example, if detects that OM version is 3.1.2
>> then don't call getSession method, call directly login method.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> > hmm the version of OM itself ....
>> >> >> >>> >> >> > we never has API call for this :(
>> >> >> >>> >> >> > It can be easily added, but why do you need it?
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil <
>> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns OM
>> version from the links you provided.
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > I already provide you with number of links to start
>> with ...
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > do you need more :))
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil <
>> thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM version?
>> If not, please guide me how can I create one.
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Thank you.
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are updated
>> to work with new REST services as expected
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :)
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM,
>> seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be
>> compatible with this API ?
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com>:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> yep, Swagger :))
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just reduced
>> the number of requests required (2 against 3) :)
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and more
>> compact :)
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM,
>> seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really good
>> idea. Especially to get a proper API document out. With Swagger you can
>> embed example request and responses a lot more easy.
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed"
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method
>> signatures have changed. But the logical flow is the same.
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Thanks,
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <
>> solomax...@gmail.com>:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> JFYI: http://cxf.markmail.org/
>> thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim
>> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document this
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise :((((
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add
>> Swanger to REST ....
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim
>> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple groups
>> error, user, group, room recording etc.
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now
>> (and produces both XML and JSON)
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I
>> haven't added PUT)
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM,
>> seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the REST
>> (GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is that the change?
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow are
>> the same, right ?
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim
>> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed
>> here: http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u)
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here
>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here:
>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/RestAPISample.html
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here: https://github.com/openm
>> eetings/openmeetings-api-plugin
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much
>> documentation :(
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome :)
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bhushan
>> Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated older
>> version of Openmeetings with our application. At the time of migration to
>> OM 3.1.2, we realized that api are changed. We want to keep old code as
>> well as write new code for newer APIs.
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api which
>> let us know version of Openmeetings.
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> WBR
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> WBR
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> WBR
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> WBR
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Sebastian Wagner
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> seba.wag...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > WBR
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > WBR
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >>> >> >> > WBR
>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > --
>> >> >> >>> >> > WBR
>> >> >> >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > --
>> >> >> >>> > WBR
>> >> >> >>> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> WBR
>> >> >> >> Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > WBR
>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > WBR
>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
