Yes, I will test it as soon as reach home. I will let you know the result. And thank you very much. :)
On Aug 19, 2016 12:59 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, implemented, you can test it using fresh nightly build > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ok :) >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Bhushan Patil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I think "Object with fields" will have more readability as we can retrieve particular info from key instead of index. >>> >>> On Aug 19, 2016 11:59 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > yep it is OK :) >>> > Thanks >>> > >>> > how would you like to get revision and build date? >>> > as Object with fields >>> > { >>> > version: 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT, >>> > revision: xxxxxxxxxx, >>> > buildDate: 2016-08-19 >>> > } >>> > >>> > as (list of Strings) >>> > ["3.1.3-SNAPSHOT", "xxxxxxxxxx", "2016-08-19"] >>> > >>> > via additional method(s) ? >>> > >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Bhushan Patil < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Maxim, I created the issue, will you check it and see if it is correctly done? >>> >> >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:56 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > Service is ready to be committed :) >>> >> > waiting for the issue :))) >>> >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Bhushan Patil < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:33 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Do you need only version? >>> >> >> > revision and buildDate can also be retrieved >>> >> >> Yes, I currently need only version but I think we should also provided revision n buildDate. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> could you please create JIRA issue? >>> >> >> Yes, I will create it. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Bhushan Patil < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Seems great. Thanks. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> On Aug 19, 2016 9:21 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > ServerWebService is actually for manging cluster servers .... >>> >> >> >>> > I'm afraid additional service is required here like InfoWebService .... >>> >> >> >>> > with SOAP method getVersion >>> >> >> >>> > with REST method GET /info/version >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bhushan Patil < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> How about 'getVersion' or 'getOMVersion' method in 'ServerWebService' ? >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:08 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> > I can add it to 3.1.3, could you propose service name for this? >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bhushan Patil < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> We are thinking that our soap services invocation code should be configurable. For example, if detects that OM version is 3.1.2 then don't call getSession method, call directly login method. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > hmm the version of OM itself .... >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > we never has API call for this :( >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > It can be easily added, but why do you need it? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns OM version from the links you provided. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > I already provide you with number of links to start with ... >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > do you need more :)) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM version? If not, please guide me how can I create one. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Thank you. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are updated to work with new REST services as expected >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be compatible with this API ? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < [email protected]>: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> yep, Swagger :)) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just reduced the number of requests required (2 against 3) :) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and more compact :) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really good idea. Especially to get a proper API document out. With Swagger you can embed example request and responses a lot more easy. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed" >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method signatures have changed. But the logical flow is the same. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Thanks, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik < [email protected]>: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> JFYI: http://cxf.markmail.org/thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document this >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise :(((( >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add Swanger to REST .... >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple groups error, user, group, room recording etc. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now (and produces both XML and JSON) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I haven't added PUT) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the REST (GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is that the change? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow are the same, right ? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed here: http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here http://openmeetings.apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here: http://openmeetings.apache.org/RestAPISample.html >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here: https://github.com/openmeetings/openmeetings-api-plugin >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much documentation :( >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome :) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bhushan Patil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated older version of Openmeetings with our application. At the time of migration to OM 3.1.2, we realized that api are changed. We want to keep old code as well as write new code for newer APIs. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api which let us know version of Openmeetings. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> WBR >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> WBR >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> WBR >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> WBR >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Sebastian Wagner >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> [email protected] >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > WBR >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > WBR >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > WBR >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> > -- >>> >> >> >>> >> > WBR >>> >> >> >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > -- >>> >> >> >>> > WBR >>> >> >> >>> > Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> -- >>> >> >> >> WBR >>> >> >> >> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> > WBR >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > WBR >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > WBR >>> > Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax
