Hello Bhushan,
Here are a few pointers to assist in resolving your issue: Check whether the traditional services are accessible: FileService, RoomService, UserService If these are accessible, then CXF engine cannot find InfoWebService and an operation for your service message. Therefore, it immediately fails, sending a fault to the sender. In such a case, your OM compilation and installation was not properly done. For #1a, #1b, #1c below, ensure you have taken the nightly build which includes Maxim’s InfoWebService message creation. 1. Service created incorrectly. a. Your WSDL service was not defined correctly. b. Your WSDL Action is null (Operation not defined or found). c. Source WSDL in each operation has not defined the SOAPAction value. 2. Compiled incorrectly due to something missing that CXF needs 3. Configured incorrectly. Possible sources of mis-configuration during compilation results in wrong configuration in dist/red5/opnmeetings/WEB-INF/web.xml Thank you. Sincerely, Hemant K. Sabat Coscend Communications Solutions Web site: www.Coscend.com <http://www.coscend.com/> ------------------------------------------------------------------ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail Messages from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at: http://www.Coscend.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html From: Bhushan Patil [mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 2:32 PM To: Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org>; om.insig...@coscend.com Subject: RE: Get Openmeetings version via SOAP/REST api Hi Hemant, I downloaded OM-3.1.3 from https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.1.x/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/openmeetings-server/target/apache-openmeetings-3.1.3-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz I extracted it then ran it. Still facing same issue. Unable to get wsdl for InfoWebService(http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/services/InfoWebService?wsdl) On Aug 21, 2016 12:12 AM, "Coscend@OM" <om.insig...@coscend.com <mailto:om.insig...@coscend.com> > wrote: > > Hello Bhushan, > > > > Did you compile OM 4.0.0 or OM 3.1.3? > > “target/openmeetings-*-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar” > > > > You might want to try > > Compiling OM 3.1.3 > (https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.1.x/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/openmeetings-server/target/apache-openmeetings-3.1.3-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz). > > > Copy only the binary from openmeetings-server/target/apache-OM-3.1.3-*.tar.gz > into a destination. > > Untar. > > Configure and use. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Hemant K. Sabat > > > > Coscend Communications Solutions > > Web site: www.Coscend.com <http://www.Coscend.com> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail Messages > from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at: > http://www.Coscend.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html > > > > > > > > > > From: Bhushan Patil [mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com > <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> ] > Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 9:59 AM > To: Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org > <mailto:user@openmeetings.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: Get Openmeetings version via SOAP/REST api > > > > Hi Maxim, I copied all target/openmeetings-*-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar from compiled > build to OM 3.1.2/webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/lib directory and started that > server. > But I am not getting wsdl for InfoWebService > (http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/services/InfoWebService?wsdl) > > Getting this in logs > ID: 2 > Address: http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/services/InfoWebService?wsdl > Http-Method: GET > Content-Type: > Headers: > {Accept=[text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8], > accept-encoding=[gzip, deflate], accept-language=[en-US,en;q=0.5], > connection=[keep-alive], Content-Type=[null], > cookie=[JSESSIONID=AA8EE59C188C596371952A44DA15ED5B; > __utma=111872281.809229259.1457255279.1463000462.1464369151.7; > __utmz=111872281.1457255279.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none); > > __hstc=181257784.b3eb117ae9ebb0d8deae6cb1844ea79b.1464369152828.1464369152828.1464369152828.1; > > hsfirstvisit=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8081%2Fnexus%2Fservice%2Flocal%2Foutreach%2Fwelcome%2F%3Fversion%3D2.12.0-01%26versionMm%3D2.12%26edition%3DOSS%26usertype%3Danonymous|http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8081%2Fnexus%2F|1464369152825; > hubspotutk=b3eb117ae9ebb0d8deae6cb1844ea79b], host=[localhost:5080], > upgrade-insecure-requests=[1], user-agent=[Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux > i686; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0]} > -------------------------------------- > DEBUG 08-20 20:21:20.845 PhaseInterceptorChain.java 88289 305 > org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] - > Invoking handleMessage on interceptor > org.apache.cxf.transport.https.CertConstraintsInterceptor@27bc8a > <mailto:org.apache.cxf.transport.https.CertConstraintsInterceptor@27bc8a> > DEBUG 08-20 20:21:20.846 PhaseInterceptorChain.java 88290 305 > org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] - > Invoking handleMessage on interceptor > org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSInInterceptor@1278a8c > <mailto:org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSInInterceptor@1278a8c> > [WARN] [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] > org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSInInterceptor - No root resource > matching request path /openmeetings/services/InfoWebService has been found, > Relative Path: /InfoWebService. Please enable FINE/TRACE log level for more > details. > [WARN] [http-nio-0.0.0.0-5080-exec-1] > org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.WebApplicationExceptionMapper - > javax.ws.rs.NotFoundException: HTTP 404 Not Found > > On Aug 19, 2016 12:59 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com > <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > OK, implemented, you can test it using fresh nightly build > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com > > <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> ok :) > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Bhushan Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com > >> <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> I think "Object with fields" will have more readability as we can > >>> retrieve particular info from key instead of index. > >>> > >>> On Aug 19, 2016 11:59 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com > >>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > yep it is OK :) > >>> > Thanks > >>> > > >>> > how would you like to get revision and build date? > >>> > as Object with fields > >>> > { > >>> > version: 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT, > >>> > revision: xxxxxxxxxx, > >>> > buildDate: 2016-08-19 > >>> > } > >>> > > >>> > as (list of Strings) > >>> > ["3.1.3-SNAPSHOT", "xxxxxxxxxx", "2016-08-19"] > >>> > > >>> > via additional method(s) ? > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Bhushan Patil > >>> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Hi Maxim, I created the issue, will you check it and see if it is > >>> >> correctly done? > >>> >> > >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:56 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com > >>> >> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Service is ready to be committed :) > >>> >> > waiting for the issue :))) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Bhushan Patil > >>> >> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:33 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > Do you need only version? > >>> >> >> > revision and buildDate can also be retrieved > >>> >> >> Yes, I currently need only version but I think we should also > >>> >> >> provided revision n buildDate. > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Maxim Solodovnik > >>> >> >> > <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> could you please create JIRA issue? > >>> >> >> Yes, I will create it. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Bhushan Patil > >>> >> >> >> <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> Seems great. Thanks. > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> On Aug 19, 2016 9:21 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" > >>> >> >> >>> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > ServerWebService is actually for manging cluster servers .... > >>> >> >> >>> > I'm afraid additional service is required here like > >>> >> >> >>> > InfoWebService .... > >>> >> >> >>> > with SOAP method getVersion > >>> >> >> >>> > with REST method GET /info/version > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Bhushan Patil > >>> >> >> >>> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >>> > > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> How about 'getVersion' or 'getOMVersion' method in > >>> >> >> >>> >> 'ServerWebService' ? > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:08 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" > >>> >> >> >>> >> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > I can add it to 3.1.3, could you propose service name for > >>> >> >> >>> >> > this? > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Bhushan Patil > >>> >> >> >>> >> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> > <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> We are thinking that our soap services invocation code > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> should be configurable. For example, if detects that OM > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> version is 3.1.2 then don't call getSession method, call > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> directly login method. > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 9:01 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > hmm the version of OM itself .... > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > we never has API call for this :( > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > It can be easily added, but why do you need it? > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Bhushan Patil > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Sorry but I couldn't find anything which returns OM > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> version from the links you provided. > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:29 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > I already provide you with number of links to start > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > with ... > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > do you need more :)) > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Bhushan Patil > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> So is there any api which I can use get OM version? > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> If not, please guide me how can I create one. > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Thank you. > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 8:12 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > yep Moodle plugin as well as PHP API are updated > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > to work with new REST services as expected > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > It also was discussed in mailing lists :) > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > <seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Was there a new Moodle plugin issued to be > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> compatible with this API ? > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-08-19 12:32 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> <solomax...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> >: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> yep, Swagger :)) > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> The general flow is the same, I just reduced > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> the number of requests required (2 against 3) :) > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Also new version is more extendable and more > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> compact :) > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:29 AM, > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Swagger you mean. Yeah that is a really good > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> idea. Especially to get a proper API document > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> out. With Swagger you can embed example > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> request and responses a lot more easy. > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Actually everything was changed" > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> =>I understand the framework and method > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> signatures have changed. But the logical flow > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> is the same. > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Thanks, > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> 2016-08-19 11:31 GMT+10:00 Maxim Solodovnik > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> <solomax...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> >: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> JFYI: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> http://cxf.markmail.org/thread/tmarv3xwewgemiut > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Maxim > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I need help from community to document this > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I have no time to write code otherwise :(((( > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Additionally I was thinking about add > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Swanger to REST .... > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Maxim > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Actually everything was changed > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 0) Axis was removed in favor of CXF > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 1) services were split to multiple groups > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> error, user, group, room recording etc. > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2) method signatures were cleaned up > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 3) REST methods are works with JSON now > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> (and produces both XML and JSON) > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 4) REST methods uses GET/POST/DELETE (I > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> haven't added PUT) > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM, > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Has it been reworked to fit into the REST > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> (GET/PUT/POST/DELETE) specification? Is > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> that the change? > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Cause AFAIK I think the methods/flow are > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> the same, right ? > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-08-19 11:09 GMT+10:00 Maxim > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com> >: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello, > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The API was changed (it was discussed > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> here: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43d5irskmknn3u6u) > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Full API as javadocs available here > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/openmeetings-webservice/apidocs/index.html > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Short example available here: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/RestAPISample.html > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> PHP API is here: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/openmeetings/openmeetings-api-plugin > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> unfortunately there no t much > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> documentation :( > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have filed issue against this: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1451 > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> suggestions/contributions are welcome :) > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Bhushan > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Patil <thebhushanpa...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:thebhushanpa...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, we have integrated older > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> version of Openmeetings with our > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> application. At the time of migration to > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> OM 3.1.2, we realized that api are > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> changed. We want to keep old code as > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> well as write new code for newer APIs. > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I am unable to find soap/rest api which > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> let us know version of Openmeetings. > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions? > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> WBR > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> WBR > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> WBR > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Sebastian Wagner > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> WBR > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Sebastian Wagner > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> seba.wag...@gmail.com > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > WBR > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > WBR > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > WBR > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >> > -- > >>> >> >> >>> >> > WBR > >>> >> >> >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > -- > >>> >> >> >>> > WBR > >>> >> >> >>> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> >> WBR > >>> >> >> >> Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >> > WBR > >>> >> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -- > >>> >> > WBR > >>> >> > Maxim aka solomax > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > WBR > >>> > Maxim aka solomax > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> WBR > >> Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4647/12842 - Release Date: 08/19/16 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4647/12845 - Release Date: 08/20/16
