Hi, Maxim, 2) performance of multiple clustered OM servers behind single should be better
In the second point, do you mean multiple clustered OM servers behind an Apache server (acts as a proxy) should be better? Thanks, Tom On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Tom, > > There are pros and cons for both configurations > 1) performance of single standalone OM server without proxy should be > better > BUT > 2) performance of multiple clustered OM servers behind single should be > better > 3) proxy might work as additional security layer (if correctly configured > :)) > > According to search, all links are here: http://openmeetings. > apache.org/mail-lists.html > I'm using http://openmeetings.markmail.org/ for searching > > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Tom Luo <mario...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Maxim, >> >> In terms of performance, is standalone OM better than Apache proxy? >> I just joined the group, so I don't know how to search the email list. >> Could you give me a link? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> You can set up Apache as proxy >>> Also you can use standalone OM >>> Please search mailing lists, there was automated script for letsencrypt >>> integration ... :) >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Tom Luo <mario...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, All, >>>> >>>> I just installed OM 4.0 in my server. >>>> Right now, I am using ip_address:5080/openmeetings to access my OM. >>>> Do I need to install Apache Http server so that I can bind my domain >>>> with my OM? >>>> Also, how do I use Let's encrypt with OM's Red5? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >> >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax >
