Yep, I hope so On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Tom Luo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, Maxim, > > 2) performance of multiple clustered OM servers behind single should be > better > > In the second point, do you mean multiple clustered OM servers behind an > Apache server (acts as a proxy) should be better? > > Thanks, > > Tom > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Tom, >> >> There are pros and cons for both configurations >> 1) performance of single standalone OM server without proxy should be >> better >> BUT >> 2) performance of multiple clustered OM servers behind single should be >> better >> 3) proxy might work as additional security layer (if correctly configured >> :)) >> >> According to search, all links are here: http://openmeetings.apac >> he.org/mail-lists.html >> I'm using http://openmeetings.markmail.org/ for searching >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Tom Luo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, Maxim, >>> >>> In terms of performance, is standalone OM better than Apache proxy? >>> I just joined the group, so I don't know how to search the email list. >>> Could you give me a link? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> You can set up Apache as proxy >>>> Also you can use standalone OM >>>> Please search mailing lists, there was automated script for letsencrypt >>>> integration ... :) >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Tom Luo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, All, >>>>> >>>>> I just installed OM 4.0 in my server. >>>>> Right now, I am using ip_address:5080/openmeetings to access my OM. >>>>> Do I need to install Apache Http server so that I can bind my domain >>>>> with my OM? >>>>> Also, how do I use Let's encrypt with OM's Red5? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Tom >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> WBR >>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
