It is in tomee and by spec. No idea in WAS which has obsolete versions
Le 8 nov. 2014 13:47, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Hi!
>
> As I can see JSR318 contains two specifications, EJB 3.1 Specification and
> Interceptors 1.1 (and later on Interceptors 1.2 MR)
>
> EJB 3.1 as well as Interceptors 1.1 are included in Java EE6.
> Interceptors 1.2 is included in Javav EE7.
>
> When I look in Inteceptors Specification 1.1 I find no references to a
> specific CDI version or to CDI at all.
>
> When I look in Interceptors Specification 1.2 I see the following:
>
> *1.2 Relationship to Other Specifications*
>
> "...and the CDI specification requires support for the chapters 2,3 and 5
> (excluding 5.5)."
>
> CDI specification here points to "JSR346 - Context and Dependency
> Injection for the Java EE Platform 1.1 (CDI specification)"
>
> *2.7 Timeout Method Inteceptors*
>
> "Interceptor methods that interpose on timeout methods are denoted by the
> AroundTimeout annotation."
>
> "Around-timeout methods can have public, private, protected or package
> level access. An around-timeout method must not be declared as abstract,
> final or static."
>
> Question:
>
> 1) From the Interceptors 1.2 I understand that @AroundInvoke is okay to
> use with a CDI interceptor using CDI 1.1, correct?
> 2) What about CDI 1.0 (JSR 299) and Interceptors 1.1, is @AroundInvoke
> also okay with CDI 1.0? I find no information on that?
>
> The reason I ask is that I do not get it to work with WebSphere 8.5.5 that
> uses OWB (with a version that atleast should support CDI 1.0).
>
> Regards
> Lars-Fredrik
>
>
> --
> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>
> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> The information contained in this electronic message and any
> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this
> message and any attachments.
>

Reply via email to