Iirc aroundinvoke was supported since the beginning Le 8 nov. 2014 14:05, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> @Romain > > I know WAS uses OWB and, as you say, some obsolete version. > > I was just curios in what CDI and OWB version the support was added. If I > try to bug report something that is not in Java EE 6 I will get the cold > hand I guess :) > > > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> It is in tomee and by spec. No idea in WAS which has obsolete versions >> Le 8 nov. 2014 13:47, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> Hi! >>> >>> As I can see JSR318 contains two specifications, EJB 3.1 Specification >>> and Interceptors 1.1 (and later on Interceptors 1.2 MR) >>> >>> EJB 3.1 as well as Interceptors 1.1 are included in Java EE6. >>> Interceptors 1.2 is included in Javav EE7. >>> >>> When I look in Inteceptors Specification 1.1 I find no references to a >>> specific CDI version or to CDI at all. >>> >>> When I look in Interceptors Specification 1.2 I see the following: >>> >>> *1.2 Relationship to Other Specifications* >>> >>> "...and the CDI specification requires support for the chapters 2,3 and >>> 5 (excluding 5.5)." >>> >>> CDI specification here points to "JSR346 - Context and Dependency >>> Injection for the Java EE Platform 1.1 (CDI specification)" >>> >>> *2.7 Timeout Method Inteceptors* >>> >>> "Interceptor methods that interpose on timeout methods are denoted by >>> the AroundTimeout annotation." >>> >>> "Around-timeout methods can have public, private, protected or package >>> level access. An around-timeout method must not be declared as abstract, >>> final or static." >>> >>> Question: >>> >>> 1) From the Interceptors 1.2 I understand that @AroundInvoke is okay to >>> use with a CDI interceptor using CDI 1.1, correct? >>> 2) What about CDI 1.0 (JSR 299) and Interceptors 1.1, is @AroundInvoke >>> also okay with CDI 1.0? I find no information on that? >>> >>> The reason I ask is that I do not get it to work with WebSphere 8.5.5 >>> that uses OWB (with a version that atleast should support CDI 1.0). >>> >>> Regards >>> Lars-Fredrik >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >>> >>> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >>> >>> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >>> The information contained in this electronic message and any >>> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >>> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >>> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >>> immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this >>> message and any attachments. >>> >> > > > -- > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this > message and any attachments. >
