Just a doubt: you asked about around invoke but spoke about timeout. Timeout should be supported IIRC but we did it after several releases ie not 1.0. Le 8 nov. 2014 15:02, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Thanks Romain.... then I will submit a bugreport.... > > /Fredrik > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Iirc aroundinvoke was supported since the beginning >> Le 8 nov. 2014 14:05, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> @Romain >>> >>> I know WAS uses OWB and, as you say, some obsolete version. >>> >>> I was just curios in what CDI and OWB version the support was added. If >>> I try to bug report something that is not in Java EE 6 I will get the cold >>> hand I guess :) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It is in tomee and by spec. No idea in WAS which has obsolete versions >>>> Le 8 nov. 2014 13:47, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> As I can see JSR318 contains two specifications, EJB 3.1 Specification >>>>> and Interceptors 1.1 (and later on Interceptors 1.2 MR) >>>>> >>>>> EJB 3.1 as well as Interceptors 1.1 are included in Java EE6. >>>>> Interceptors 1.2 is included in Javav EE7. >>>>> >>>>> When I look in Inteceptors Specification 1.1 I find no references to a >>>>> specific CDI version or to CDI at all. >>>>> >>>>> When I look in Interceptors Specification 1.2 I see the following: >>>>> >>>>> *1.2 Relationship to Other Specifications* >>>>> >>>>> "...and the CDI specification requires support for the chapters 2,3 >>>>> and 5 (excluding 5.5)." >>>>> >>>>> CDI specification here points to "JSR346 - Context and Dependency >>>>> Injection for the Java EE Platform 1.1 (CDI specification)" >>>>> >>>>> *2.7 Timeout Method Inteceptors* >>>>> >>>>> "Interceptor methods that interpose on timeout methods are denoted by >>>>> the AroundTimeout annotation." >>>>> >>>>> "Around-timeout methods can have public, private, protected or package >>>>> level access. An around-timeout method must not be declared as abstract, >>>>> final or static." >>>>> >>>>> Question: >>>>> >>>>> 1) From the Interceptors 1.2 I understand that @AroundInvoke is okay >>>>> to use with a CDI interceptor using CDI 1.1, correct? >>>>> 2) What about CDI 1.0 (JSR 299) and Interceptors 1.1, is @AroundInvoke >>>>> also okay with CDI 1.0? I find no information on that? >>>>> >>>>> The reason I ask is that I do not get it to work with WebSphere 8.5.5 >>>>> that uses OWB (with a version that atleast should support CDI 1.0). >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Lars-Fredrik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >>>>> >>>>> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >>>>> >>>>> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >>>>> The information contained in this electronic message and any >>>>> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >>>>> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >>>>> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >>>>> immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this >>>>> message and any attachments. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >>> >>> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >>> >>> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >>> The information contained in this electronic message and any >>> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >>> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >>> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >>> immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this >>> message and any attachments. >>> >> > > > -- > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this > message and any attachments. >
