On 03/06/2015 02:23 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Packaging software which depends on php54 > for platform which doesn't have php54...
To be fair, they have advertised dumping php53. To be honest, if you look at my history on this forum you will see a recent post where I too got blindsided by this very thing. The Software Collections route I went to was something new to me, but it ended up not being too bad. Now I have httpd24 and php55 running on Scientific Linux in production with owncloud 8. The post shouldn't be too hard to find, but if you need help let me know. I will be happy to do what I can. > I would think that E in RHEL means that the packager should be careful > about screwing up your users. Trust me. This is one of my biggest pet-peeves. Especially with the absurd notion recently of pushing bleeding-edge packages that haven't hit a one year birthday yet into Enterprise grade OS and LTS support. This really frightens me. But I would also expect that an admin who joins me in the fight for keeping that E of highest importance would break a dev box...not a production one... ~Stack~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ User mailing list User@owncloud.org http://mailman.owncloud.org/mailman/listinfo/user
