In 0.5 we do have two backend: hadoop and local, so in theory it is possible to write a different backend. But you need to be aware that 0.5 is out of support for a long time, and miss a lot of features.
Daniel On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:03 AM, devdoer bird <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. > > Which version keep this legacy? I'm trying add this feature to Pig 0.5. > > 2012/1/9 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> > > > Pig do have a abstraction layer in execution engine. But that is mostly a > > legacy of early versions. In recent development, we never keep platform > > neutral in mind so I don't know how reliable this interface is. Can you > > elaborate your idea so we may find a better solution? > > > > Daniel > > > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:50 PM, devdoer bird <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > HI: > > > > > > I want to implement a new pig backend . Can I replache the hadoop > > backend > > > with a hadoop--streaming only backend? > > > > > > I decide to use streaming to implement backend.storage and backend > > > .executionengine interface , but I want to know whether it's a right > > way > > > to do so. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > >
