What error did you see when you use official Pig distribution? It's non-trivial to write a backend even if possible (Especially for 0.5, it would be hard to get help from the community)
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:16 AM, devdoer bird <[email protected]> wrote: > So I think Streaming backend may be a good solution for this situation. > > 2012/1/9 devdoer bird <[email protected]> > > > The reason I decide use Streaming as backend is that In my company the > > hadoop has been modified so it might not be compatible with the official > > hadoop distribution. And I can't make the pig run on our private hadoop > > distribution. > > > > > > 2012/1/9 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> > > > >> Pig do have a abstraction layer in execution engine. But that is mostly > a > >> legacy of early versions. In recent development, we never keep platform > >> neutral in mind so I don't know how reliable this interface is. Can you > >> elaborate your idea so we may find a better solution? > >> > >> Daniel > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:50 PM, devdoer bird <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > HI: > >> > > >> > I want to implement a new pig backend . Can I replache the hadoop > >> backend > >> > with a hadoop--streaming only backend? > >> > > >> > I decide to use streaming to implement backend.storage and backend > >> > .executionengine interface , but I want to know whether it's a right > >> way > >> > to do so. > >> > > >> > Thanks. > >> > > >> > > > > >
